[who_would_fardels_bear]

I think we owe him a favor. The rewording is so contrived and ridiculous. If the 2nd Amendment had been worded that way all along, when would it ever have been an issue? A member of the National Guard uses a gun to shoot a looter after a hurricane: Was it a Constitutional act or not?

What if there were amendments like:

The right of the people to engage in sexual intercourse within a marriage between a man and a woman shall not be infringed.

The liberals would go apes__t!

[Olog-hai]

Even further, “between one man and one woman” . . . what would the Muslims and their liberal “allies” then say?

[C210N]

Just some more wordsmithing...

"The right of the people to engage in sexual intercourse within a marriage between a man and a woman, being necessary for the general welfare of a free state, shall not be infringed."