Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Pig; Kenny

It say 900 cattle on desert land. What is the carrying capacity of such land. Ranchers have a right to run cattle on public lands for a fee (usually fairly low which it says he is not paying), but they don’t have a right to destroy the land with over grazing. It sounds like he is just plain against. Of course, with 14 children, he may not have the money.


10 posted on 04/11/2014 10:18:29 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
They've been grazing cattle on that land since 1870.
They probably know the carrying capacity.
45 posted on 04/12/2014 12:26:01 AM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin
The area in question is 628,000 square miles. I don't think 900 head of cattle would do all that much damage.

And what exactly the hell would they be damaging....weeds?

And one more thing. The irrelevant tortoise in question is not an endangered species.

67 posted on 04/12/2014 9:16:44 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum (I live in NJ....' Nuff said!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

Mr. Bundy said he quit paying the fees when the govt cancelled his contract. He accepts that he owes about $300,000.


68 posted on 04/12/2014 9:37:45 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson