The “pro-life liberal movement”.
No, I don’t see that as being any big threat since it doesn’t even seem to exist, unless you mean just rinos.
Libertarians are real, they not only run the third largest political party, but they are also the most aggressive element of the left within the GOP, and are breathing fresh life into the rinos, who are adopting the same language as their social liberal fellow travelers.
Only the conservatives are true.
See Rand Paul, he is a much hotter property than Huckabee or Santorum, who were only transient figures of desperate primaries, Paul has Romney’s passion to complete his father’s vision and as article after article points out, as does he himself, he is the social liberal who can bring in the social liberals.
“”I think that the Republican Party, in order to get bigger, will have to agree to disagree on social issues,” Paul advised. “The Republican Party is not going to give up on having quite a few people who do believe in traditional marriage. But the Republican Party also has to find a place for young people and others who don’t want to be festooned by those issues.””
Well, normally the Santuckabee contingent is not called RINO - but I suppose it fits. You also continue to deny the vast over lap between libertarian philosophy and conservative philosophy because for whatever reason you are obsessed with the group of libertarians who are extremely liberal on social issues. That part of the puzzle is there, but it’s not the only part, something which apparently escapes you.
You should look up Reagan and libertarians…..and learn.