Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

They paid money for the settlement of all claims, eviction and boundary adjustments, not for land. See the actual treaty articles in Post #115 and Post #142.


143 posted on 04/11/2014 11:35:15 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage
Okay, but when we defeat a government and claim their territory, that land becomes property of the government. In this case the treaty established owners of land at the time of the defeat could remain.

Are we saying Bundy's owned the land at the time we took it from Mexico? It sounds to me like the Bundy's homesteaded and never gained title to the grazing lands.

148 posted on 04/11/2014 11:45:13 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
Okay, but when we defeat a government and claim their territory, that land becomes property of the government. In this case the treaty established owners of land at the time of the defeat could remain.

Are we saying Bundy's owned the land at the time we took it from Mexico? It sounds to me like the Bundy's homesteaded and never gained title to the grazing lands.

149 posted on 04/11/2014 11:45:13 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson