Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert

Yours is not a cogent argument before a court. The inhabitants had rights of water and grazing that the treaty recognized. Look at Articles VIII and IX of the treaty.

I don’t think the feds can present a winning argument in court. It’s not a cakewalk for them by any means.


131 posted on 04/11/2014 11:01:07 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

The feds already presented winning arguments in court, twice.


153 posted on 04/11/2014 11:48:37 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

haven’t already lost in court several times?

I’m sympathetic to their cause but it seems the law is not on their side.

So far there is no shooting so that is good


169 posted on 04/11/2014 12:46:46 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson