Let's face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud, whether in different states or in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let's get rid of it wherever it exists! (Of course, this should in no way interfere with advocating for other much-needed anti-fraud measures such as photo voter ID.) Integrity of the election process should always be a more important goal for state elections officials than convenience.
Morris is a pretty good statistician and frequently did and does his own polling, including during the 2012 presidential race. On the basis of his polling and that of others, he publicly predicted a comfortable Romney win. Morris intuitively knows that the main reason for the wide divergence between his prognostications and the reported results was fraud and cheating - which you can't pick-up even in the best designed polls. Hopefully, some day he'll get the courage to get into the real truth of the matter, but he doesn't do a very good job here.
“Let’s face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud...in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let’s get rid of it wherever it exists!”
Early voting will not go away. There are too many voters to process them in one day.
If you’re registered in more than one state and one or more has early voting, it’s possible to vote early in one state and on Election Day in the other.
Perhaps, but my bet is that most of the vote fraud lies in mail-in ballots. The get-out-the-vote push is concentrated on registration and the mail in ballots are done rather anonymously. I believe that mail in ballots should be picked up at voting headquarters with someone showing (gasp) a proper voting ID. Period. Yes, there are hardship cases, such as handicap, blind, etc. But that is a small percentage.
I heard Morris interview the NC official who announced the number of nearly-certain double votes. And on the basis of the lack of cooperation from large states - including, incidentally, Texas and Florida - it was clear that the problem could very easily have swung the margin of victory. Morris didn’t go where the data didn’t lead, tho - no party ID data was presented to him, and he did not draw (or at least didn’t articulate) party conclusions from it.
You and I were talking about this a year and a half ago.
What took them so long to figure it out?
Oh no? Really? Really, Dick?
You so sure he's only playing dumb?
In national elections the campaigns have internal polling and precinct numbers that are very very accurate. They generally know well before the polls even open on election day who has won. Certainly after voting starts they know when an election has been won or lost. It was VERY obvious to me that Romney knew he had won when only one speech was prepared. The team did not even prepare a concession speech because it was not going to be needed. If you were watching FOX at all and saw karl Rove you could see in his expression and the way he was talking that the numbers just did not even make sense and the only answer was massive fraud.
Romney won the election.
I have been voting since Reagan and never once stood in line for an hour to vote. This was true all over the US. It is a complete myth and part of the coverup to say that many republicans stayed home and didn't vote.
At this point we simply have no election integrity at all. It is vital that people understand that voting in national elections is never going to restore limited government.
The only workable solution/s lie outside of Washington.