Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol
Then when Bundy stopped paying his grazing lease, he stopped having access rights to that land.

That's not the way the daughter explains it, nor the way he explained it on TV last night.

So, there are 2 sides to this story, and today the Nevada Governor slammed the Fed and not Bundy.

85 posted on 04/10/2014 12:54:41 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I’m sure that the Bundy clan feel that they have been wronged. But her own statement shows that not to be the case. From the article “... These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads...”

Their ancestors paid the government to use that land.

“...My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve....”

Bundy himself paid grazing fees but when he disagreed with how those fees were used, he quit paying. Of course, to make his position sound better, he says he “fired” the BLM. Guess what, he doesn’t get to fire the BLM because the BLM was established by the land owner (US government) to manage the land that the US government owns. They did not work for him in the first place.

Once he stopped paying his fees, he stopped having access rights to that land. No different than a renter who stops paying rent.


101 posted on 04/10/2014 1:04:40 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson