[GAFreedom]

1. What do you think of the Harry Reid connection?

Since it comes from Alex Jones, I ignore it until it comes from a reputable source. Jones is a loon. Believes the Bushes and Clintons are lizard people, like David Icke. He's always talking something crazy.

2. What does misrepresenting the tortoise endangerment do to past court rulings that utilized those assumptions?

Not a thing until that misrepresentation is proven in court.

3. What does BLM overkill do to their case; i.e., bringing snipers and heavy artillery to a cow ranch?

Nothing. If there's no law against it, overkill is purely a matter of opinion - and has no legal bearing.

4. What do the “1st amendment zones” say about the Fed’s opinions of the American people?

Well, since "free speech zones" have existed since 1988 and have been discussed and approved by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. South Carolina, Brown v. Louisiana, Cox v. Louisiana, and Adderley v. Florida, I don't have much of an opinion about 'em. Does it pass the 4-part TPM test that was set up by the Court? If it does, then it's legal. *shrugs* If we don't want them to exist, we need to outlaw them.

But I don't see what that has to do with the material bearing on the case.

[xzins]

1. Harry Reid involvement: I didn't get it from Alex Jones. I got it on Free Republic from a post by Daxton Brown, a freeper who has been on Free Republic about 2 years, also the author of a book about Harry Reid. His was the first Harry Reid connection that I saw. Also, my memory of a free republic thread says that Alex Jones picked it up from Free Republic, but my memory could be wrong. Daxton Brown's summary: (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid_bundyranch.php

2. Tortoise misrepresentation. You say it means nothing until proven in court. That's not true, really. You know they are exterminating tortoises and have been for a while, and you know that those restrictions are eased for developers wanting areas. What I hear you telling me is that you measure truth based on its being upheld in court. Would you say the same about the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ?

3. Sniper overkill? You have no opinion on that action and how it impacts your evaluation of truth, overreach, etc? Interesting.

4. 1st amendment zones? Despite broad censure by many Americans this is still just a matter of "truth by Court decision?" It makes no difference to you in terms of freedom, of the American values of independence, free speech, and free press? And this has no bearing on your evaluation of what's going on in this case.

I'm disappointed at your handle, GAFreedom. I expected some intensity regarding freedom.

[P-Marlowe]

Well, since "free speech zones" have existed since 1988 and have been discussed and approved by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. South Carolina, Brown v. Louisiana, Cox v. Louisiana, and Adderley v. Florida, I don't have much of an opinion about 'em. Does it pass the 4-part TPM test that was set up by the Court? If it does, then it's legal. *shrugs* If we don't want them to exist, we need to outlaw them.

You should be ashamed of your handle. The Entire United States of America is supposed to be a FREE SPEECH ZONE.

What are you doing on a website called FREE REPUBLIC when you are promoting tyranny and limitations on the rights of the people?

GATyranny is a better handle. Change it.