Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster; P-Marlowe

I’m glad you’d seen it.

I think Cliven Bundy and family are hashing and rehashing over and over continuously what they know, and why they think what they think about all this . They’re looking for the right way to explain what they think. I think they remember different facets of the past as they ponder and as they’re asked questions and as other’s prod them with thoughts and information.

What they know and believe....little doubt of that...is that they have a right to be there the same as the rocks, cactus, and turtles. It’s been their home for generations.

One thing that strikes me is that they’re Mormons, and as such, they probably date back to that original Utah group that continued to spread. Joseph Smith and crew just staked out Salt Lake and claimed it and other settlements. I’m not Mormon, but I don’t recall them paying anybody for it. Do you?

I think he might have hit on the right response when he said last night on Hannity that he simply disputes the right of the Fed Government to own 80% of Nevada.


333 posted on 04/12/2014 7:01:53 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I think he might have hit on the right response when he said last night on Hannity that he simply disputes the right of the Fed Government to own 80% of Nevada.

When you think about it, the Federal Government has not exactly been a good steward about the land it "owns" in Nevada. They poisoned hundreds of thousands of acres of Nevada with above ground nuclear tests and almost all of the land they "own" is undeveloped land that provides no benefit to the American economy. If the land were in private hands or at the disposal of the State, then Nevada would likely prosper like the deserts of Israel.

Again you are correct. There is no provision in the Constitution that allows the Federal Government to "own" real property within state boundaries. We are supposed to be a FEDERAL Government consisting of 50 SOVEREIGN states with the rights not specifically granted to the Federal Government to be retained by the States. This would include the rights of ownership over the real property rights within the borders of that State subject only to the regulatory powers in the COMMERCE CLAUSE.

Wake Up Nevada. Bundy is fighting for YOU!

334 posted on 04/12/2014 7:10:55 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

You have FReep mail.


335 posted on 04/12/2014 7:23:55 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson