Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpeakerToAnimals

That is totally irrelevant to the argument. It could be the most desolate place on earth, yet technology exists to grow fields of corn in that place. There needs to be oversight management of federal lands otherwise people will have the opportunity to abuse it.

Another irrelevant point is whether the federal government has the right to manage it. That is a WHOLE different argument.

In this case, the agreement was established long ago, and Bundy failed to uphold his part of the contract. So now he must keep his cattle off the land.

Bundy grazed his cattle on that ground, and he owes fees to do so. He stopped paying. His rights are terminated.


153 posted on 04/10/2014 2:21:16 PM PDT by SgtHooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: SgtHooper
I do not believe the fedgov needs to manage anything. Let them run a desert and there will be a shortage of sand. The land of the free is dead. We are about to find out if the USA is still the home of the brave. This hill or another, someone, somewhere will make a stand against this evil fedgov.

I saw a movie where the people did not resist. Schindlers List.

162 posted on 04/10/2014 2:38:05 PM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson