Well, out here in the West, the government does that. It tries to grab up thousands / millions of acres. Per the Constitution, that land has to be granted to the US by the state and must be paid for by the US Government (Article 1 section 8).
Now, should there be a constitutional limit on the holding of the US government within a state. Sure, I can support that. How about a limit of 20%. But that is a different conversation that does Bundy have the right to graze on public lands without paying the usage fees required by law?
If you look back though the thread, I think you will find that I never said he does.