Nor was there playful banter to make the sarcasm evident. It was dead serious.
I was reading that thread for entertainment.
I saw the remark you reference, and I agree with it, coming as it did in response to your talk of wax dummies substituted for bodies in coffins.
I notice you're not saying WHO the remark came from...
I’ve never said I thought there was a wax dummy in a coffin. I said that what was in the coffin was immaterial to me because there are ways to make it appear like a person is there - but that I brought the subject up because there was EVIDENCE that KITV photoshopped the footage, and because the one known-authentic image did not fit what was in the photoshops. Just like what’s actually in the “Good Morning America” and “Nightline” videos don’t fit what is in the official narrative. Nor does what is in the official reports fit what is in the “official narrative”.
But oh well. Nothing to see here. Only crazy people would care that none of it makes sense.
Evidence doesn’t matter. That’s the lesson to be learned in all of this. At Free Republic evidence does not matter. What matters is if “mainstream people” will think that we’re pointing out evidence that suggests something BATSH!T CRAZY.
IOW, take the posts I’ve put in this thread, remove anything that I put in that let people know I say it sarcastically, put it in the mouth of the leadership here, and you’ve got a pretty good picture of what’s going on.
Anybody wanting to discuss evidence that might suggest something is wrong - REALLY wrong - in America, be careful or you may be labeled batsh!t crazy and told to get a life.
Just want to make sure everybody knows that because there are a LOT of threads on FR that people like ABC would call “batsh!t crazy”, and people who participate in those threads might want to think twice before commenting, or suggesting anything “unapproved” - regardless of what evidence they cite to support their comments.
Start right here at the comment I’m replying to, to see how people justify serious comments just like the sarcastic ones I made.
BTW, I never did say I thought there was a wax dummy in a casket, and anybody who says otherwise has really poor reading comprehension. I said I was surprised that there WASN’T - but instead there was a photoshop of some images that didn’t match the genuine photo of the casket.
The method is the same though. Start out with the assumption that there are some things beyond the dignity of this thug regime (such as faking a death/funeral in order to give somebody a new identity away from potential Congressional investigation - like we already know they did with dozens of Benghazi witnesses) and then when anybody comes up with evidence that suggests that this unthinkable thing actually happened, you mock it (or watch the thread for amusement purposes) and then say that the idea is batsh!t crazy so go away to Alex Jones.
That’s how it’s done. People get a real kick out of laughing at claims that the regime (or somebody else) might have done elsewhere exactly what was done in Benghazi.... It’s just such a hilarious subject... What kind of morons would think that the regime would go to the trouble of faking deaths to evade investigations? .... Only idjits. We all know Benghazi didn’t happen....