Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

“If the U.S. owns the land, they get to make the rules about who uses it and how it is used.”

The Constitution lays out very specific purposes for the land that the fed gov is allowed to own. This area under contest does not qualify in any way, shape or form with any one of those specific purposes.

I’m starting to wonder about you.

Semper Fi, Mac.


160 posted on 04/10/2014 12:23:46 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Grimmy
The Constitution lays out very specific purposes for the land that the fed gov is allowed to own. This area under contest does not qualify in any way, shape or form with any one of those specific purposes.

The land in question was purchased from Mexico for $15 million 16 years before Nevada became a state. It is "territory or other property belonging to the United States" under Article IV Section 3. Nevada disclaimed the land when it became a state. The isn't a States' Rights issue.

170 posted on 04/10/2014 12:37:21 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson