Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obituary: Windows XP passes away, leaving behind millions of mourning supporters
PCWorld ^ | 4-8-2014

Posted on 04/08/2014 11:51:45 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae

Windows XP, Microsoft Corp.’s beloved seventh major operating system and arguably the company’s most successful, was left to perish on Tuesday at its creators’ hands. It was 12 years, seven months old.

~snip~

Windows XP’s funeral, a private ceremony held deep within Microsoft, was quiet. In lieu of flowers, Microsoft urged customers to donate to Windows 8, one of Windows XP’s grandchildren.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcworld.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: microsoft; msn; office2003; windows; windows81; windowsxp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: All
You've heard of the Walking Dead? Now it's the Browsing Dead.


61 posted on 04/08/2014 1:04:20 PM PDT by McGruff (Want to hurt Mozilla? Don't use Firefox's search bar. That is their money maker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Or you could run the old OS on a VM on the new hardware and get the best of both worlds.


62 posted on 04/08/2014 1:04:21 PM PDT by discostu (Call it collect, call it direct, call it TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
"Although running as virtual machine never seems to work quite right."

For this purpose, the "legacy replacement XP" that you download would be specially designed to work properly in the VM, by Microsoft.

63 posted on 04/08/2014 1:04:46 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
BTW, MSE is no longer supported.

The new security software for Win 8 and 8.1 is a new *Windows Defender*, seems to work pretty good and is supposedly better than MSE.

Been using Win 8.1 on my new machine, only a day and a half of cussing before I got a handle on it and it ain't bad at all, faster compared to Win 7 and XP.

64 posted on 04/08/2014 1:05:25 PM PDT by The Cajun (tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

The problem with that model is support. How many devs should they have writing patches for their 13 year old OS? How many techs on phone or web support should be trained in their 13 year old OS? How much downward compatibility should the new software have with their 13 year old OS?

Supporting multiple versions of the same software is incredibly expensive, each additional version adds time to training, complexity to your dev environment (gotta keep able to build the old stuff), and you’re sapping resources that could be used to add features to the next version. Dropping XP drops 2 OSes from their support list (because there’s actually two XPs out there the 32 bit original and the 64 bit “upgrade”), that’s millions of dollars saved. There’s no way your model would keep XP profitable. It’s ancient, way past time to kill it, anybody that still has a business need to keep it needs to hoard hardware for it, or make the switch to VMs.


65 posted on 04/08/2014 1:10:10 PM PDT by discostu (Call it collect, call it direct, call it TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae

I have 7 on my desktop and still have XP on my laptop. Some of the “improvements” in file handling on 7 are no improvements at all. It works okay. But no one was demanding a change from XP, which has been working just fine. The change to 7 was more of a con game to boost Microslop’s income and stock values than any need to address problems with XP.


66 posted on 04/08/2014 1:11:45 PM PDT by Seruzawa (Get ready, little lady. Hell is coming to breakfast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Is XP unsafe to use while surfing the net?


67 posted on 04/08/2014 1:17:03 PM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
If you like your XP, you can keep your XP...............

LOL!

I've been running XP since the SP1 days of late 2002. Updated to SP2 in late 2004 to get some of the Wi-Fi enhancements. Would still be there if TurboTax had not insisted on SP3, installed in early 2009. SP3 was really worth it.

I understand MSFT makes money by selling software. But they have to offer real value to get existing users to upgrade. In my case (Win XP SP3 and Office 2000). MSFT has never given me a good reason to upgrade. There are lots of features and bell and whistles in XP and Office 2000 that I never use. So why should I upgrade?

Having said that, I may update to Win 7 Pro one of these days just for kicks. There are really few differences between XP and Win 7.

Of course, it's different strokes for different folks and YMMV.

68 posted on 04/08/2014 1:17:47 PM PDT by upchuck (Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
How old is your computer?

I liked MSE. A lot less intrusive with less bloatware than Norton and Mcafee and best of all it is free. It has worked fairly well.

For home, I'll probably install Norton which is free through Comcast.

69 posted on 04/08/2014 1:18:26 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: discostu
"The problem with that model is support. How many devs should they have writing patches for their 13 year old OS? How many techs on phone or web support should be trained in their 13 year old OS? How much downward compatibility should the new software have with their 13 year old OS?"

I doubt that any of those would ever be an issue. Security issues would be handled by the newer OS that the VM is running on.

"There’s no way your model would keep XP profitable. It’s ancient, way past time to kill it, anybody that still has a business need to keep it needs to hoard hardware for it, or make the switch to VMs."

I never said it would be profitable......but it would let customers who have VERY EXPENSIVE HARDWARE (like that $1MM++ superconducting NMR) that cannot run with newer OS's keep that hardware up and running, and keep those customers buying NEW COMPUTERS with the NEW OS as customers.

70 posted on 04/08/2014 1:18:36 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There are plenty of computer repair stores with OEM XP discs, and they can reinstall the OS.


71 posted on 04/08/2014 1:31:59 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

I know of some scientific equipment that only runs on NT4 SP5. The vendor has been out of business for a long time. Evidently the equipment can still be bought used and there are 3rd party techs around that support the system as is. Same thing with some laser milling equipment. That vendor is out of business and only runs on W2K. In those cases you just keep backup computer hardware and image files on hand.


72 posted on 04/08/2014 1:41:05 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
My new one is a Toshiba Qosmio about 2 weeks old.
I was running XP on my old machine with MSE.
The Toshiba came with Norton, one of the first things I did was to get Windows Defender up and running and uninstall Norton.
Also installed Malwarebites free and Kaspersky TDSSkiller also free, to keep an eye on Windows Defender.
I run them once a month to make sure nothing slipped through on Microsoft.
Never had a problem with MSE, don't expect problems with Windows Defender.

Oh, while I was setting up and had only Norton running, it let a bunch of adware/malware through, Malwarebites cleaned it out.
Setting up Windows Defender became my priority after that, no further trouble since.

73 posted on 04/08/2014 1:42:03 PM PDT by The Cajun (tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

That paragraph isn’t about it on a VM, it’s about your idea of them keeping all the OSes available for download for a fee. That has the OSes running straight up, which means they’ve got to be supported and patched and everything else.

If it wouldn’t be profitable there’s no reason to do it. MS is a business, they exist to make money, period. Customers that have very expensive hardware that can’t run the new OSes have had a long time to figure hoard equipment and copies of XP to keep that setup going. Nobody is forcing them to uninstall XP, they’re just not making patches for it anymore. If they want to be on new computers then they need to get with the OEMs and figure out why they can’t run the new OSes and fix it.


74 posted on 04/08/2014 1:42:55 PM PDT by discostu (Call it collect, call it direct, call it TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Windows 7 does not run all the windows XP applications (Myst for example)


75 posted on 04/08/2014 1:56:46 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
Thanks for the pointers.

I'll probably continue to run XP with free Norton from Comcast. I wonder if you can only install pieces of it. The system performance feature is a waste of resources. I think that it has a back up program too.

76 posted on 04/08/2014 2:05:57 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

resources used to support XP are needed for supporting current and future products.


77 posted on 04/08/2014 2:08:12 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John O

Apparently their solution is to create a virtual machine utility. It is a bit finicky for us here at work.


78 posted on 04/08/2014 2:12:22 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
cant get Bing or Google to work..

Hmmm. That's interesting. I recently got hold of an old laptop running XP, and I had that exact problem. Other search engines (e.g. Duck Duck Go) worked fine. The machine was totally clogged up with crapware and remnants of old sofware loads, and it was very sluggish. I did a total reload, and now it works like a champ, with no problem with Bing or Google.

It has nothing to do with XP's demise, but there's something you have that's blocking those sites, but I have no idea what it is.

79 posted on 04/08/2014 2:24:48 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae

To celebrate the passing, I bought my wife a new lap top

Windows 8 will challenge her to keep her skills up to snuff


80 posted on 04/08/2014 2:27:33 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson