Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Issa report: IRS applied ‘systematic scrutiny’ only to conservative groups
Washington Post (blog) ^ | April 7, 2014 | By Josh Hicks

Posted on 04/07/2014 2:56:38 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

A new report from the head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee tries to discredit Democratic claims that the Internal Revenue Service targeted both liberal and conservative groups for extra scrutiny during the past two election cycles.

“These Democratic claims are flat-out wrong and have no basis in any thorough examination of the facts,” Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the panel’s chairman, said in an executive summary of the findings. Before the 2010 election, the IRS began using “be on the lookout” lists, or BOLOs, to screen for groups that might be involved in too much political activity to qualify for tax-exempt status. An inspector general’s report last year found that the agency inappropriately singled out applicants based on their names and policy positions.

Issa’s report, released Monday, revealed that all three of the IRS’s test cases involved conservative organizations — the Prescott Tea Party, the American Hunto and the Albuquerque Tea Party. Two of the groups dropped their applications as the review process dragged on, according to the findings.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: fascism; irs; issa; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2014 2:56:38 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Think of this in the same terms as a person of African persuasion trying to vote in Mississippi in 1959. There was a strange literacy test (probably written in Chinese), plus there was also a poll tax that had to be paid, and various other hoops to jump through, and the right to vote was STILL denied....

There is a civil rights violation here somewhere.


2 posted on 04/07/2014 3:03:26 PM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

of course they did... because they were being used as a weapon to trip up political opposition

will anything be done about this blatantly illegal use of govt?

of course not.

will ANYONE go to jail over it?

of course not.

meanwhile, all these fedgov types will get paid while ‘investigating’

unless something gets done with the results, its all a total waste of money


3 posted on 04/07/2014 3:05:13 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I am expecting an apology from Elijah Cummings.


4 posted on 04/07/2014 3:05:41 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

That guy who talked stuff about Obama at the prayer breakfast also got audited.
Coincidence or police state?
And yes, Nixon was “not a crook” by today’s standards.


5 posted on 04/07/2014 3:12:54 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
`In truth, the IRS left Democrats alone' Gomer Pyle photo:  gomer-surprise.jpg `Gomer' Issa and the House Oversight committee ride around in a short yellow bus, right? Maybe they should spend less time making wallets and come over here to FR & read our tag lines. Maroons ...
6 posted on 04/07/2014 3:14:56 PM PDT by tumblindice (Are all Democrats inveterate, habitual liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

So? Just what is Congress going to do about it? Write a “strongly worded” letter?


7 posted on 04/07/2014 3:15:28 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Driving Miss Lois

"Yes,m...dat's Issa up ahead. Youse wants me ta run ovah his contemptible hide?"

8 posted on 04/07/2014 3:15:36 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
ALL OF THIS THIS NEEDS TO GO VIRAL One of the Articles of Impeachment drawn up against Richard Nixon was merely "threatening" to use the Internal Revenue Service to selectively audit political opponents.

OBAMA HAS WEAPONIZED THE IRS AGAINST POLITICAL OPPONENTS ordering multiple covert campaigns of intimidation, threats, and persecution of tea party/conservative organizations, and those daring to criticize Obama's agenda.

<><> Seven lock-stepping Democrats scared-***tless of losing their seats ask the IRS to “Investigate” political opponents,

<><> Rep Elijah Cummings led the Democrat pack in smearing True the Vote patriot Catherine Englebrecht....

<><> der leader Obama said Tea Parties were a "threat to democracy."

<><> The IRS (a tax-funded L/E agency) takes its marching orders from Democrat;

<><> the FBI, ATF, the IRS, and OSHA were sicced on Catherine Englebrecht, as she valiantly tried to improve the US voting system.

=======================================

DEMS STOOP TO CONQUEUR--order IRS to act to save their seats
by Alexander Bolton, The Hill, 2/13/14

Senate Democrats facing tough elections this year want the IRS to play a more aggressive role in regulating outside groups expected to spend millions of dollars on their races. In the wake of the IRS targeting scandal, the Democrats are publicly prodding the agency instead of lobbying them directly.

Dems are also careful to say the IRS should treat conservative and liberal groups equally, but they’re concerned about an impending tidal wave of attack ads funded by GOP-allied organizations. Much of the funding for those groups is secret, in contrast to the donations lawmakers collect, which must be reported publicly.

One of the most powerful groups is Americans for Prosperity, funded by the billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch. It has already spent close to $30 million on ads attacking Democrats this election cycle.

“If they’re claiming the tax relief, the tax benefit to be a nonprofit for social relief or social justice, then that’s what they should be doing,” said Sen. Mark Begich (D), who faces a competitive race in Alaska. “If it’s to give them cover so they can do political activity, that’s abusing the tax code. And either side."

Asked if the IRS should play a more active role policing political advocacy by groups that claim to be focused on social welfare, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) responded, “Absolutely. Both on the left and the right,” she said. “As taxpayers, we should not be providing a write-off to groups to do political activity, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.”

Shaheen called the glut of political spending by self-described social welfare groups that qualify under section 501(c) (4) of the tax code “outrageous.” Shaheen is in a good position now but could find herself embroiled in a tight campaign if former Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass) challenges her.

Sen. Mark Pryor (Ark.), the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent, said the IRS has jurisdiction over 501(c)(4) groups, as well as charities, which fall under section 5/01(c)(3) of the tax code and sometimes engage in quasi-political activity.

“That whole 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4) [issue], those are IRS numbers. It is inherently an internal revenue matter,” he said. “There are two things you don’t want in political money, in the fundraising world and expenditure world. You don’t want secret money, and you don’t want unlimited money, and that’s what we have now.” --SNIP--

9 posted on 04/07/2014 3:17:42 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

10 posted on 04/07/2014 3:19:18 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Oh no - A NEW REPORT!! To be followed by a terse appearance on Greta, to be followed by more consternation, to be followed by threats of holding Lerner in contempt of Congress, to be followed by more hearings, to be followed by continuous fundraising highlighting the consternation felt by Republicans in Congress on this matter.
11 posted on 04/07/2014 3:47:00 PM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Impeachment is NEVER going to happen. And even if it did nothing would come from it.

Anything short of civil disobedience is an act of futility.


12 posted on 04/07/2014 3:50:13 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

Bad really bad. But worst of all, the Democrats have little to say about it. And if they have a word or two it is critical of the investigation.

They forget that the same IRS authority can be used against them. It is bad either way.


13 posted on 04/07/2014 3:53:14 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Lol.

I think that it is more than Lerner that he is protecting. She is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

14 posted on 04/07/2014 3:54:33 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Lock Lois Lerner and Elijah Cummings up, both in the same cell. Lois would probably enjoy that! They should both get prison time. They BOTH COMMITTED PERJURY BEFORE CONGRESS DURING HEARINGS. BOTH OF THEM DID.


15 posted on 04/07/2014 4:11:37 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

LOL! Lois’ “let them eat cake” face is priceless. ROFL!!!!


16 posted on 04/07/2014 4:14:02 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

17 posted on 04/07/2014 4:49:06 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it.

(apologies to the late, great Rodney Dangerfield)


18 posted on 04/07/2014 4:54:52 PM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
I am expecting an apology from Elijah Cummings.

The second coming of Jesus Christ will happen before he apologizes.

19 posted on 04/07/2014 5:09:33 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
I am expecting an apology from Elijah Cummings.

The second coming of Jesus Christ will happen before he apologizes.

20 posted on 04/07/2014 5:19:00 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson