The law is a blunt instrument in this case. If the law says that the mother must die, she might leave five children behind.
Since it’s so likely that both will survive after 24 weeks — is a law that makes the choice necessary? The instances of having to choose in this case are miniscule — millions of babies are aborted for convenience, not to save a mother’s life.
That's true and it's a big black mark on our society. Those who have no conscience in doing that won't ever have a dilemma if they have to decide between be the lives of the mother or the unborn child.
Then we have pro-life people who may possibly face the "life of the mother versus the life of the baby". Thankfully I haven't been put in that situation. As I suggested in a previous post, a 1963 movie, The Cardinal is an interesting film on the subject. I watched it years ago and want to see it again with my older eyes to find out what I think now.