It frustrates me to no end that NO ONE SEEMS TO READ ANYMORE.
The article said “big gop donors”.
The article never had the word “conservative” in it anywhere.
The gist of the article is that the GOP wants a winner and Bush is the strongest candidate so far.
If you want to name a stronger candidate, the lets hear it and the gop donors will likely get behind a stronger candidate.
If you can’t name a stronger candidate (Tom Tancredo and Newt Gingrich won’t cut it) then you need to shut up your bellyaching. Oh and Palin’s resume to be potus is that she was AK governor for 2 years 7 months and mayor of Wasilla (population 5,000).
Like it or not, your realistic choices are likely to be Santorum, Bush, Romney, or Ryan.
Cruz should run and Cruz should lose due to a thin resume and inexperience in running a national campaign. The way to get experience in a national campaign is to run in 2016 , finish a close 2nd or third, and then he will be ready in 2020.
The article said “big gop donors”.
The article never had the word “conservative” in it anywhere.
-------------------------------------------------------------
FROM THE ARTICLE :
The report also claims that a hard press has begun to get Bush into the race because CONSERVATIVE leaders and longtime Republican operatives are concerned about the electoral viability of New Jersey governor Chris Christie and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul.
---------------------------------------------------------
since we settled that, i'm not real sure what your point was, but please relax.
Cruz is a lovable honest man, just what the people need to help restore confidence and leadership in Washington.
Cruz’s qualifications are leaps and bounds above what Obama had coming into the race.