Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
I believe the essential issue to be that NATO was over-extended when Russia was weak and none of the Neo Cons involved ever stopped to ask the question: Would we really defend such a country at crunch time against a nuclear power?

I agree. Wars start over such miscalculations.

51 posted on 03/27/2014 5:21:51 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Always A Marine

No one will ever die over Narva.

NATO is a bloated organization without nowhere near the resources to adequately defend every member country.

We would do well to drop every country east of Germany and get back to NATO’s core mission of defending the West, which is sustainable.

A NATO of 28 is far less credible for Western security than a NATO of 12.


54 posted on 03/27/2014 5:26:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Always A Marine
"Wars start over such miscalculations"

1914 all over again. Entangling alliances over nothing that matters to most of the American People.

64 posted on 03/27/2014 6:00:43 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson