Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
The Guttmacher Institute reports that more than 99 percent of women aged 15-44 who have ever had sex have used at least one type of contraception. Conservatives probably can't antagonize this entire group, but you have to give them credit for trying.

But why does your employer need to pay for it? Should your employer be required to pay for your vitamins and running shoes, too? How about your meals?

4 posted on 03/27/2014 7:15:25 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sooth2222
Mostly, this is NOT about contraception, forcibly paid for by me, your employer!

This is argument is about whether I, as your employer, must be forced by law to pay for drugs whose sole purpose is to produce an abortion of your baby!

Folks this isn't about me, as an employer, paying for acne, diabetes, high blood pressure, life saving heart drugs, or me, as an employer, by force of law created by the Obama Administration and one political party only, being forced to pay for drugs whose sole purpose is to kill the babies of my employees.

Do I, as an employer, have the moral right to refuse to participate in the premeditated murder of the unborn or must I choose between participating in the murder of innocent unborn babies or shutting down a business that provides for the livelihood of thousands of people?

19 posted on 03/27/2014 7:55:51 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Sooth2222

Sooth2222: “Should your employer be required to pay for your vitamins and running shoes, too? How about your meals?”

If one is logically consistent, yes. Under Obamacare, the government could just as easily mandate that health insurance cover exercise equipment and healthy food.

The ACA gives government virtually unlimited power to decide what is or is not health care. Even worse, the SCOTUS has ruled the fines are actually income taxes. Meaning? The government could fine someone up to 100% of income for failure to comply with the ACA mandates, because there is, of course, no constitutional limit on income tax.


23 posted on 03/27/2014 8:05:19 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional "rights" cherished by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson