Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Matters inexplicably attacks Fox News for using the term ‘homosexual’
The Daily Caller ^ | 25 Mar 2014 | Brendan Bordelon

Posted on 03/25/2014 7:13:26 AM PDT by mandaladon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: pacobell

Yes it is rather queer to think that people would be so concerned about what word should be used to refer to perverts of a homosexual nature, isn’t it. I do rather resent the fact that a fine old word like “gay” has been appropriated in such a queer fashion by the homosexuals, I think we should throw a few faggots* on the fire and talk about how really queer all this is while drinking some good stout ale.

*Faggot (unit), archaic unit of measurement for bundles of sticks


121 posted on 03/25/2014 11:47:02 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Him being busted with a tranny hooker makes me skeptical of his shtick.


122 posted on 03/25/2014 11:58:47 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mears; mandaladon
It will not end so long as those who seek to control the once free speech of others, can get away with harassing people for simply using correct English. We should just ignore the demands of anyone who seeks to dictate English usage for ulterior purposes.

Frankly, what should be protested, is the all too common misuse of the adjective "gay." Exhibitionists, who seek to deliberately offend others by "in-your-face" antics, calling attention to their behavioral peculiarities, should not be allowed to appropriate English usage which was once far better applied to a happy, flirtatious girl, enjoying the attention of nice young men.

No, we are not word police, and will not be able to stop the present misusage; but we can certainly ignore the advice of those who corrupt language.

123 posted on 03/25/2014 12:40:30 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh, I totally agree-if they are so fond of the game, then they should embrace the name...

And anyway, I’m tired of having the word “gay” misused-I don’t think I’ve ever met a gay/happy homosexual of either gender, either in my job as a case manager, and certainly not in my present occupation-they are mostly miserable, and never, ever happy with anything.


124 posted on 03/25/2014 12:52:31 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Daffy

My trusty 1957 Webster’s, “...4) wonton; licentious; as, a gay dog.”


125 posted on 03/25/2014 12:59:47 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

“In it, reporter Jeremy Peters likens the term to using “colored” to address black people and asserts that the word contains “the ring of disapproval and judgment.” “

Then why hasn’t the NAACP changed their name?


126 posted on 03/25/2014 1:03:18 PM PDT by truth_seeker (Nissan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan5
Gay used to be my favorite word when I was learning to read.

They ruined it.

127 posted on 03/25/2014 1:11:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Okay, tell me what they’d have the guys at Fox call Dave Brock.


128 posted on 03/25/2014 1:13:35 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Then you’re a homophobe.


129 posted on 03/25/2014 1:37:50 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

What does Czerina of linguistics Rachel Jentael have to say about this?

“That’s real retarted sir. It’s homosexu-uh not homosexuAL”


130 posted on 03/25/2014 2:13:56 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacobell
Seems like kind of a queer thing for Media Matters to be concerned with.

Archtroll David Brock is gay. He was a conservative investigative journalist who was turned using his homosexuality by people around Hildebeast, when he was doing a book about her.

He hashed up the book, pulled his punches, but Frank Rich (gay himself) outed Brock in The Old Grey Whore. Brock lost his gig writing for American Spectator and conservatives shunned him -- exactly what Rich intended.

So he crossed over to the Dark Side, went to work for John Podesta (then organizing MediaMatters), and the rest is .... sludge and slime.

Gamey, unappealing story, but there it is. Another dark victory for Beastwoman.

131 posted on 03/25/2014 2:51:08 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reg45
So if you order your BLT with Gucamole, ....

Yup, that's a GBLT, which you can enjoy while rolling around in your Mazda Miata or (if you're fe-MALE), your Lesbaru WRX.

</off stereotype cars>

132 posted on 03/25/2014 2:56:08 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson