Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Is Not Wanting to Vaccinate a Parental Right?

Yes.

If it is not then we open the door to the state being able to tell us what kind of medical treatments we must give our children.

Soon we end up with things like what happened to Justina Pelletie happening with no place to appeal.

Once you say a parent must do what the state wants in an area it is not long before you have no rights at all in that area.

4 posted on 03/24/2014 7:45:13 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Most people who choose not to vaccinate aren’t fearing the chemical itself : All medicines are complex and mysterious and we simply don’t understand them.

And when compared to the Polio vaccine or the vaccines of yesteryear - Modern vaccinations have more influence from the government than from our doctors. And therein is the problem. We see new data that links serious issues to the vaccine - And the government telling us to take them. When the government tells you to do something, It’s NEVER in your best interest.

Lastly, These forms also have lines that say things like “I understand that opting out of a vaccination program puts my child’s life and health at risk” and then it requires signature. What you’re doing is signing your kids away. You’re signing a piece of paper that will allow the state to come and take the kids. That’s intolerable.

I choose not to vaccinate now. I have vaccinations from when I was a kid but those vaccines are different than what we are facing these days. It’s a totally different ballgame.


6 posted on 03/24/2014 7:57:00 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“Once you say a parent must do what the state wants in an area it is not long before you have no rights at all in that area.”

OK Then I don’t want to be responsible for paying that parents’ medical bills when that child contracts a preventable disease. Let the child die at home with their parents watching.


8 posted on 03/24/2014 8:03:20 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

This reminds me of a case in Indiana when I lived there. A local kid came down with diabetes. The family refused to go to a doctor and prayed for him. He died. I noticed that the father (in pictures) had glasses. Evidently medical devices were OK for him, but not the kid. He was let off with probation.

Cases like that are murder and the parents should be tried as such when they kill their kid. Including vaccinations.


11 posted on 03/24/2014 8:26:17 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I reject the basis of all your arguments thus far; that the decision for one child doesn’t hurt the other children.

It does, polio, and how it is spread is but one example of that.

You want to risk it for your kids, fine, I have no problem with that.

You want to infect my kids too? There’s an answer I want to see from you.


25 posted on 03/24/2014 5:34:08 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson