Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jurroppi1; rjsimmon

Also note the last portion of the sentence “and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.”

Why would they restrict the Fed gov’s ability to fine issuers of insurance alone if it was meant to protect individuals buying insurance (not issuers)?

I’m pretty sure that issurers participate in the exchange, and individuals purchase insurance from the exchange or through other means as they see fit - this doesn’t apply to the individual mandate to have a minimum federally approved level of coverage to avoid the individual mandate penalty/tax.


75 posted on 03/21/2014 4:14:05 PM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1

“Why would they restrict the Fed gov’s ability to fine issuers of insurance alone if it was meant to protect individuals buying insurance (not issuers)?”

because, they needed to get the buyin from big insurance companies to get their backing and money to lobby for ACA’s passage? do you believe that this administration was actually concerned about protecting the average jane or joe when crafting this monstrosity? i’m not so sure.


76 posted on 03/21/2014 4:36:43 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson