Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOVERNMENT WORKERS COST 45% MORE THAN PRIVATE SECTOR WORKERS
Breitbart Big Government ^ | March 14 | by CHRISS W. STREET

Posted on 03/13/2014 2:15:55 PM PDT by Hojczyk

The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announced on March 12th that the total cost of employing a state or local government worker is 45% more than an equivalent worker in the private sector.

For the month of December 2013, employers in private industry spent an average of $29.63 per employee hour worked, but the equivalent cost for a government worker averaged $42.89 per hour.

Not only do government employees average 33% higher pay than those in the private sector, their pension and retirement benefit costs are now an incredible 254% higher also.

Given that compensation formulas for federal, state, and local government are comparable, it should come as no surprise that this year spending by the U.S. government will exceed revenue by an all-time high of $744.2 billion, and our gross national debt is a stunning $18.5 trillion.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: feralguvmint; g42; public
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Hojczyk
That turns out not to be the case.
The gap in pay between federal employees and private-sector workers has jumped 8 percentage points since last year, according to new data presented at a Federal Salary Council meeting Friday.

On average, federal employees earn 34 percent less than their private-sector counterparts, according to the council's analysis....


21 posted on 03/13/2014 3:55:31 PM PDT by Aqua Buddhist ("If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." --R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aqua Buddhist

Overgeneralizations are misleading

some jobs may be easy to compare, skilled crafts, or licensed professionals, for example.

governments have some unique job titles like police, firefighter, judges, fighter pilots,

I would be interested in comparison of identical jobs.


22 posted on 03/13/2014 4:34:11 PM PDT by John Galt's cousin (WTF? We couldn't rescue four men in Benghazi? Is our military IMPOTENT? ( /s ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin
I would be interested in comparison of identical jobs.

That's the crucial variable for getting useful comparisons. The statistic cited in this article appears to just use lumped-together averages, which naturally skews the result (there are millions of burger-flippers in private business but hardly any in the government, especially since they contracted out all the janitorial and maintenance functions).

23 posted on 03/13/2014 4:44:37 PM PDT by Aqua Buddhist ("If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." --R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I’d be willing to bet that if the military was removed from the equation the cost of government employees would be a whole lot higher.


24 posted on 03/13/2014 6:57:41 PM PDT by mikefive (RLTW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“their pension and retirement benefit costs are now an incredible 254% higher also. “

Piped right into the false Stock Market


25 posted on 03/13/2014 7:03:37 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
true for military as well....

we think we have public "servants" and what we really have is public "obligations" that go on and on and on......

26 posted on 03/13/2014 7:33:22 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
the "party" people in Russia always vacationed on the Black of Caspian sea....

if I was to do it all over again, I'd say every couple should have one worker for the state so they can get all the bennies and days off and glorious pensions and health care....

27 posted on 03/13/2014 7:35:21 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It used to be gov’t work didn’t pay as much as the private sector but they had good benefits. Now it pays more plus they have outstanding benefits. Something has got to give.


28 posted on 03/13/2014 7:38:14 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (This is not just stupid, we're talking Democrat stupid here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin
fire and police are also vastly overpaid and over benefitted....IMO...which I have the right to have....

retire in 20 yrs on near full pay?....or retire on "disability" over "stress"....or have serious marks against you like our local where one guy was working another job while docked into his cop job and another was banging his married girlfriend while supposedly on his job...that guy quickly "retired" and so now he'll get probably more than most people get working...

I am just tired of it....

29 posted on 03/13/2014 7:40:52 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Please note that this article is about State and Local Government employees, not Federal employees.

As for Federal employees, the question whether they are overpaid or underpaid depends upon the amount of their education. This CBO report from 2012 supports this line of thinking.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/01-30-FedPay.pdf


30 posted on 03/13/2014 7:48:33 PM PDT by LRM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
Part of the problem we see with pensions, is that politicians agree to the labor contracts, probably to get endorsements from unions. ALL of those labor contracts are approved by the governors and legislatures.

They have agree over the years to contracts that have wage increases as well as deferred benefits such as retirement and healthcare in retirement. The politicians (and the people who vote for them)try to not acknowledge the future costs of those promises in their yearly budgets. They kick the can down the road. They have been doing it for at least a generation.

We now see some government entities unable to pay for the benefits that their predecessors had promised. The taxpayers are on the hook, not the now-moved-on politicians who went along with the labor agreements.

In christie-Cuomo land, I understand that the NJ State Pension system is ‘underfunded’ because the governors and the legislatures over the years have not put cash aside to pay for the pension obligations. Incredibly, New York's State Pension system is (reportedly) adequately funded, because of a difference in the laws or state constitution that require municipalities to make annual contributions.

On the other hand, cops in parts of the NY metropolitan, after a year or three, have base salaries approaching $100,000.

Public employees have better unions than the rest of us. The people who work in those jobs got lucky. Instead of bitching about it, we have to get active and make candidates promise that they will act as fiscal conservatives. We can't allow any of them to keep ‘kicking the can down the road”

31 posted on 03/14/2014 3:05:05 AM PDT by John Galt's cousin (WTF? We couldn't rescue four men in Benghazi? Is our military IMPOTENT? ( /s ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson