Jeb Bush, who the hell is he? It must be his turn, though.
I guess... I should be happy to even see Hillary under 50%
NO MORE BUSH’S
These polls are about as accurate and useful as predicting global warming/global cooling/climate change.
are any of us waiting for a Hillary vs Cruz/Paul, Cruz/West, or maybe a Cruz/Walker ticket Poll?
Oh goodie.
So the choice would be between another Clinton or Bush dynasty.
No thank you.
Aww, that leaves Jeb out. Darn !! /s
Jeb Bush was governor of Florida. A citizen of Florida was being murdered. Bush allowed the murder to proceed.
I will never forget or forgive.
Jeb Bush murdered Terri Schiavo.
I’m sure the MSM will help the sheep select another “Emanuel Goldstein” to play the role of the faux opposition candidate to Big Brother (or Big Sister; what difference does it make).
Saw this on Reuters ... : o /
Just spoke to Tatar leader in #Crimea: ‘Obama is a bad president. We need another Bush in the White House.’ Strong sense of US & UK betrayal
Ian Birrell (@ianbirrell) March 7, 2014
by Nigel Stevenson (Reuters) 7:01 AM
http://live.reuters.com/event/world_news
First of all, do they really think there will be a 2016 election? Zero is not about to give up the perks of the throne. Second, the democrat brand will be so tarnished after zero is done, Jeb will win in a Nixonesk landslide.
And this, dear friends, is why we are headed for another civil war.
On the GOP side it’s clear that there is consideration of issues when evaluating a candidate. We conservatives scrutinize on things like amnesty, abortion, traditional family values, gun rights, and so forth. Even the Rino’s in our party do this, albeit coming to very wrong conclusions because they are sold on the idea that they must compromise with the left to have a chance at winning. But regardless we consider issues and will not vote for a candidate that does not support at least most of them. Thus, many of us don’t want Bush for the reasons mentioned in the article and more.
Contrast this with the other side. Sure there are some who are die hard libs who actually think socialism works and can give you the theoretical reasons why. But there are many, many more who simply aren’t bright enough think past their own doorstep. Women who may disagree with the donkeys on every issue except abortion, but blindly go to the polls and vote uterus first, all else be damned. There are many, many voters who wouldn’t know a political issue if it bit them in the derrière, but know they need to vote democrat to get pail after pail of warm government slops. I’m convince that know one short of women with alternative lifestyles actually like Hillary... But to these people it doesn’t matter. The democrats could run Paris Hilton. And they’d pull the lever... And unfortunately these people breed like rabbits.
I’ve never understood Hitlery’s appeal. She has no personality, unlike (hate to say it but it’s true) her husband.
I'm so confident that they'd rather have hillary be president than have a TedCruz/RandPaul ticket.
Those “Repatriate to Belize” people could not have a better advertisement.
I weep for my country...
I really doubt that the Dems are going to run Hillary, when it comes right down to it.
ANd while these hypothetical polls are worthless, it was interesting to see that even this was manipulated. There was actually only one point difference between Hillary and Bush in the raw numbers, and only when they added the question about the “Bush family history” did Hillary get higher numbers.
In other words, they’re going to play on Bush Derangement Syndrome again, among both Dems and Republicans. Never mind the horrible history of the Clinton family...I guess that doesn’t count. It was just Bill being Bill, and as for Hillary’s miserable tenure as SOS, well, what’s a girl to do?
If these are the only candidates running, who cares? For the third straight presidential election, we will have two candidates who agree on almost everything.
Why even bother? Let’s just elect our own candidate and set up a government in opposition.