Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3

Cruz is just another politician. He has already stabbed us in the back on amnesty, and the more secure his power becomes, the more he’ll vote with the leftards.


4 posted on 03/02/2014 11:02:03 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dsc; neverdem
One writer criticizes Ted Cruz for being a limelight seeking opportunist and the next skeptically dismisses Cruz as a non-entity.

The important thing, is that all these people are talking about Ted Cruz.

My bias: I support Ted Cruz and I accept the premise laid down by Michael Walsh:

The party in D.C. will go on, spending like there’s no tomorrow because, in fact, there is no tomorrow. And then it will stop.

Accepting that premise, the only question which remains is how do we shape the "culture" to accept the charisma offered by Ted Cruz on the assumption, contrary to poster dsc that Ted Cruz will sell us out and indeed has already sold us out. My reply is that if Ted Cruz ain't your man, you have no man and you have no hope. Either we go with Cruz and Mike Lee or we stay with what we have which is Groundhog Day and the flat-out insanity of repeating the inputs over and over again expecting different results

J. Christian Adams addresses the issue head-on: will the Ronald Reagan message sell again or are the Rinos correct and we have to go along to get along? The answer is clear, if we go along,

there is no tomorrow. And then it will stop.

Whether a bareknuckle conservative message can still win elections is an argument that is rendering the Republican Party in twain but it is to me perfectly clear after the experience of the Bush administration with Republican majorities in both Houses that unless we have a bareknuckle conservative government we will have no tomorrow.

So the argument about winning or losing on conservative values is moot, if we don't win on those values we lose anyway.


5 posted on 03/03/2014 2:03:43 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc

And when did he do that?


7 posted on 03/03/2014 2:34:05 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
You are full of crap. Cruz hasn't stabbed us in the back on amnesty.

/johnny

11 posted on 03/03/2014 4:04:06 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc

Cruz has never stabbed us in the back on amnesty. He is the best thing going for us on the Right.


12 posted on 03/03/2014 4:23:23 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc

I don’t recall Cruz ever favoring amnesty or voting for the left Dems/RINOs proposals.

I see you’ve been here on FR for many years, but that posting comes across like something a far left troll would make.


18 posted on 03/03/2014 5:43:26 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc; o2bfree; 12th_Monkey; 230FMJ; TWhiteBear; painter; tbw2; Ricebug; parthian shot; mrsmel; ...

Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!


20 posted on 03/03/2014 7:27:52 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
Cruz is just another politician. He has already stabbed us in the back on amnesty, and the more secure his power becomes, the more he’ll vote with the leftards.

You're confusing Senator Cruz with Senators Paul and Rubio.

Each of which, have their own Amnesty plans.
21 posted on 03/03/2014 7:29:00 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson