Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flintlock

>>‘All Nukes’ is not the best policy<<

Yes it is


11 posted on 02/22/2014 2:49:13 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

>> Yes it is <<
It depends on what you want to do.

For intelligence gathering in hostile environment a smaller sub with less crew might be better. A smaller submarine can get much closer to the shore.

Just compare a Virginia-class with a Type 214.

Crew: 135 / 27
Cost: $3b / $0.5b
Torpedoes: 26 (4)/ 13 (8)*
VLS: 12 / n.u.**
Endurance: unlimited (food supply) / 84 days

*: Type 212 (tubes)
**: not used but Vertical Multi Purpose Lock (VMPL) available, just like the ones on Block III Virginias.

Nuclear powered subs are faster but also much louder. Even a US nuclear submarine can’t be at two places at once.


13 posted on 02/24/2014 4:21:30 AM PST by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson