Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CVS tobacco ban just the start. Next: soda
The Boston Globe ^ | February 8, 2014 | Derrick Z. Jackson

Posted on 02/09/2014 2:20:11 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

IT IS GREAT CVS is ending cigarette sales by October, and I know exactly what other dangerous products should go behind the counter when the wall of cancer sticks comes down: Coke, Pepsi, Gatorade, Red Bull, and all other sugary beverages. I say this because I take CVS’s new public health pronouncements seriously.

In announcing the tobacco ban, CVS chief medical officer Troyen Brennan said the drugstore industry is positioning itself to offer more clinical services for chronic diseases. He wrote Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association that it is a “paradox” to sell cigarettes as pharmacies work with primary care clinicians to treat hypertension, diabetes, and other conditions “exacerbated by smoking.”

If CVS truly cares about all the sources of diabetes and other preventable diseases, soda should be the next target. Two days before Brennan’s op-ed, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the most dramatic findings yet linking high sugar consumption to heart disease. The WHO and the American Heart Association recommend that less than 10 percent of a person’s daily calories should come from the added sugars found in processed foods, snacks, and beverages. But 71 percent of Americans exceed that figure.

The study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, found that people whose added sugars comprise between 10 to 25 percent of their calories were at 30 percent higher risk of dying from heart disease...

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cigarettes; cvs; foodpolice; nannystate; pufflist; smoking; soda; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Derrick and his cohort knows what's good for you. Feel better now?
1 posted on 02/09/2014 2:20:11 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why did he leave high-fat products on their shelves? When a product (like potato chips) has 50% to 70% of its calories from fat, it has no place in a healthy diet. Since we're not smart enough to make that choice on our own (just ask Bloomberg, CVS, Obama, Pelosi, or any other liberal individual or organization), shouldn't CVS make that decision for us?

CVS = Carrot-Vegetable Shop

2 posted on 02/09/2014 2:30:59 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Don’t forget that Subway is now teamed up with Mrs. Obama to dictate what our children can eat:

Subway joins first lady Michelle Obama’s healthy eating effort
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3115837/posts


3 posted on 02/09/2014 2:35:18 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have no problem with this action by CVS. It is their business and they get to run their stores as the wish.


4 posted on 02/09/2014 3:05:34 AM PST by Fzob (Jesus + anything = nothing, Jesus + nothing = everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob

Oh, I agree. And I don’t have to darken their doorways, either. And no, I’m not a smoker.


5 posted on 02/09/2014 3:06:54 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There’s a good selection of sweets in those type of stores. Can they forego the profits form that too? (Type II diabetes)


6 posted on 02/09/2014 3:14:32 AM PST by pa_dweller (Extremist tea-party-driven hostage-taking legislative arsonist without a life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They banned Tabasco?

I prefer Cholula anyway.


7 posted on 02/09/2014 3:32:30 AM PST by x1stcav ("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob

Indeed. Their business. Just like an Amish restaurant I went to once (The Amish Door, Wilmot OH I think)— due to their religious beliefs, they don’t sell booze and they are closed on Sundays. It’s their business.

Once CVS made its announcement I got talking on Facebook and joked about how CVS will apparently still have its aisles of candy and soda and don’t forget the lottery tickets (people are addicted to gambling, too). If they want to market themselves as a true health store and want to give these up, fine, and people can go across the street to Walgreen’s if they want smokes. What would be different would be statism, if a state outlawed things like these “for the common good”.
(For years Mass. wouldn’t allow stores to open on Sundays...shouldn’t you be in church instead, sir?)

Imagine if the US, or a state, outlawed tobacco. Not only would it be bad for the tobacco growers, think of all the TAXES that would not get collected. For that matter in my state, Mass., the nanny staters want higher taxes on soda and candy. That’s the solution, more money to the state coffers.


8 posted on 02/09/2014 3:38:16 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

CVS can sell or not sell anything they want. It is their business.
This action opened the door for the Marxists to start thinking that maybe they can now dictate what a pharmacy or any other store can or cannot sell.
I see years of wrangling and targeting those businesses that don’t tow the Marxist line.


9 posted on 02/09/2014 3:49:24 AM PST by lucky american (The Democrats will follow the big "D"even if it means going over a cliff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, CVS, get rid of ALL those impulse candies, energy drinks, beef jerky, etc. at the checkouts. Be true to your ideals.


10 posted on 02/09/2014 4:04:56 AM PST by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Prophetic....

http://billstclair.com/DoingFreedom/000623/df.0600.fa.lipidleggin.html


11 posted on 02/09/2014 4:14:01 AM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Followed by energy drinks and candy which will finally upset the libnerd progressives so much they finally understand to what degree of a traitor 0 is especially when they discover Moochelle has a whole stash of both at the WH and doesn’t follow her own advice. Libnerds can’t make it without their Monster energy drinks.


12 posted on 02/09/2014 4:22:57 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Fzob
I have no problem with this action by CVS. It is their business and they get to run their stores as the wish.

Oh, I agree. And I don’t have to darken their doorways, either. And no, I’m not a smoker.

+1 and +1

Although I still maintain the offloading tobacco in favor of health services resulting in a first year revenue break-even ($2 billion loss from tobacco, $2 billion gain from health services) with revenue gains the following year (from increasing demand for health services, synergies from having prescriptions both written and filled in the same store and partnerships with large health-care companies like Kaiser) makes very, very good business sense for them.

I also don't see them offloading soda that easily. Looking at how large of a footprint it has in their stores, sodas rake in a LOT more revenue than tobacco products do. Tobacco is 1.5% of their revenue, easy to toss under the revenue neutral then revenue + scenario projected. Soda won't be an easy toss for them.
13 posted on 02/09/2014 4:23:18 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fzob

> I have no problem with this action by CVS. It is their business and they get to run their stores as the wish.

That’s not the issue. Setting the precedent for other stores to follow suit is (that is, if they are given a choice).


14 posted on 02/09/2014 4:25:41 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

The Marxists will applaud decisions like CVS’s openly, but behind the facade, they are terrified that if dozens of other companies follow suit, cigarette tax money will dry up.

About 57% of the cost of a pack is comprised of local, state and federal taxes.


15 posted on 02/09/2014 4:26:30 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just making shelf space for the “medical” pot ;-)


16 posted on 02/09/2014 4:38:14 AM PST by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Average Al

You may be right.


17 posted on 02/09/2014 4:38:58 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well - i have an idea for a new store... and i’m not telling yet. ;-)


18 posted on 02/09/2014 4:41:28 AM PST by Frapster (Build the America you want in your home... and keep looking up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

What might be occurring is CVS has agreed to conduct a social experiment for the government to see how The People will react to this type of intrusion. If they can get the mindless libs to follow along stating whatever reason sounds good (to keep medical costs down for the ACA will probably be the one touted) they know they can march forward to control even more aspects of our lives. I’m guessing CVS will probably recieve a huge tax break as an incentive.


19 posted on 02/09/2014 4:42:07 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

CVS is still selling morning after pills, I’d assume.


20 posted on 02/09/2014 4:45:28 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson