Obamacare Means More Kids Tucked In at Night Without Dinner
Meals are not a problem. Kids can get three meals a day at school. But kids like homes-preferably heated or cooled depending on the season, and clothes, and shoes, a bike, school supplies, possibly playing on a sports team or some kind of music/dance/art lessons, and somewhere down the road the chance to pursue higher education.
But I guess tucking the kids in at night is more important than providing them with any of those other things.
Or are all the poor schlubs who don't have kids to tuck in at night or whose kids are grown supposed to subsidized those who do have kids, but don't want to work enough to provide for them?
These Rats are despicable. They are perpetuating a myth that savings you might get by becoming Obamacarebots will make up for not having an income.