Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trader Joe's was planning to build a new store on a vacant lot in a poor neighborhood in Portland, Oregon. The people who lived in the neighborhood were in favor of it.

But then a bunch of radical leftist activists, who don't even live in the neighborhood, prevented it from being built.

1 posted on 02/05/2014 11:21:10 AM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: grundle
The Portland African American Leadership Forum (PAALF) objected to the proposed development partly because it feared that the new retail complex would eventually push up rental prices in the area and drive out the local black community.

Next PAALF will be complaining that they live in a "food desert."

2 posted on 02/05/2014 11:23:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The only way women can "have it all" is if men aren't allowed to have anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
The Portland African American Leadership Forum (PAALF) objected to the proposed development partly because it feared that the new retail complex would eventually push up rental prices in the area...

In other words the PAALF feared the development might significantly improve the neighborhood, so they opposed it.
3 posted on 02/05/2014 11:24:27 AM PST by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

My understanding is that those opposed to this are unhappy with the “gentrification” of the neighborhood and that a Trader Joe’s would further that process. The opponents want to bring “displaced” blacks back to the neighborhood, apparently the kind of blacks that would not or could not shop at a Trader Joe’s. I can only assume that they would like to turn the vacant two acre site into a mini-ghetto to re-establish the original neighborhood ghetto.


4 posted on 02/05/2014 11:26:11 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Liberal/Progressives want minorities to be dependent on government not having a chance for careers. They don’t want folks running off the plantation and to be slaves of the governmental welfare state.


5 posted on 02/05/2014 11:26:36 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

solution (if a good grocery with some great food items mostly at quite reasonable prices .....is deemed “not appropriate?” to the neighborhood)......: let another couple big liquor stores move in and ask them to sell some junk food on the side

...problem solved?

(and then maybe we can get TJ’s to build their new store near us here, instead...we’d love to have a local TJ’s to shop at!)


6 posted on 02/05/2014 11:27:15 AM PST by faithhopecharity (C?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

How horrible, to bring economic development to a poor neighborhood. Heaven forbid that people should learn to work and become self-sufficient.

/sarc


7 posted on 02/05/2014 11:27:30 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Rough part of town.
Maybe the locals didn’t want to wear Hawaiian Shirts?


8 posted on 02/05/2014 11:27:30 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Does anyone know what the people in the neighborhood wanted?
I could see it going either way.

On the one hand if it was going to drive up property values, that could be a positive for the people in the neighborhood.

But on the otherhand, they’d have to move because of the higher taxes and it would break up the community.


9 posted on 02/05/2014 11:29:29 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Does anyone know what the people in the neighborhood wanted?
I could see it going either way.

On the one hand if it was going to drive up property values, that could be a positive for the people in the neighborhood.

But on the otherhand, they’d have to move because of the higher taxes and it would break up the community.


10 posted on 02/05/2014 11:29:30 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; goodnesswins; PROCON; Twotone; VeryFRank; Clinging Bitterly; Rio; aimhigh; Hieronymus
**"a loss for the city” and particularly for Northeast Portland.**

If you would like more information about Oregon, please FReepmail me. I lost my Oregon list when my computer crashed last month.

11 posted on 02/05/2014 11:29:58 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

12 posted on 02/05/2014 11:30:09 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

This is insane. They should’ve gone for a deal that would bring jobs in the retail complex to minority workers who live nearby.


14 posted on 02/05/2014 11:30:45 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

How long before the local paper laments the ‘food desert’ in the neighborhood and the lack of entry level jobs?


15 posted on 02/05/2014 11:30:47 AM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Neighborhood is very amish. A friend of mines grandfather, non-amish, was beaten nearly to death during a home break-in a mile from there.


18 posted on 02/05/2014 11:34:43 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Very sad. But it’s not just limited to black areas. All the lefties turn out to protest any development anywhere. It happens all the time in my town, usually because elderly lefties really want their neighborhoods to continue to decline (until they can leave their mildewing property in a dead neighborhood to some less than thrilled heir) because they’ve got theirs and they don’t want to see the neighborhood improve.

In my town, it’s usually the 65+ white ladies out there screaming about the desecration of their neighborhood by some perfectly innocuous business that wants to move in there (and in fact, the ladies live in zones that are already zoned mixed use). So that means young people can’t have services that would actually be beneficial to families, and the neighborhood remains a frozen, old-lady paradise.

I guess the old ladies have never realized that this affects their own property values, but actually, they probably don’t care.


22 posted on 02/05/2014 11:40:08 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Doesn’t matter the city, building on MLK Drive is not a good business plan...except for the selling of stolen cell phones and illegal pharmaceuticals.


23 posted on 02/05/2014 11:40:48 AM PST by fungoking (Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

This is my old neighborhood.
The “gentrification” battle is a front thrown out as a bone to the rabidly liberal population to fight over.
The truth is of course - it is over money.
The city is so in bed with developers there that the land was being almost given away. I assume the company didn’t want to get messed up in that.
Sad, since everybody wanted that store on a lot and “food desert” that’s been vacant for decades.


24 posted on 02/05/2014 11:40:58 AM PST by dk88 (Outlaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Typical liberal plan....keep them on the dole....


27 posted on 02/05/2014 11:42:42 AM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

You mean bring jobs to a poor neighborhood? How dare they!!!!


30 posted on 02/05/2014 11:45:42 AM PST by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
these groups are evil groups that are actually insultingly racists toward blacks. Basically saying blacks can't thrive and grow and come up the income later if they are in poverty. Wow. What a curse and what a lie and how completely unAmerican.

Oh the irony of those that believe these groups are 'helping' them. Just like the Democrats that hold down the empowerment of blacks. They ay just thrive and leave the party to join the Republicans or (OH KNOW!) the tea party!

:-D

32 posted on 02/05/2014 11:53:23 AM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson