Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STORM WARNING: NOAA forecasters estimate a 90% chance of geomagnetic storms on Jan. 9th
spaceweather.com/ ^ | January 9, 2014 | Spaceweather.com

Posted on 01/09/2014 7:45:34 AM PST by tired&retired

STORM WARNING: NOAA forecasters estimate a 90% chance of geomagnetic storms on Jan. 9th when a CME is expected to hit Earth's magnetic field. The speed of the solar wind around Earth could spike to 700 km/s (1.6 million mph) shortly after the impact, sharply compressing Earth's magnetosphere. High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras.

http://spaceweather.com/

HUGE SUNSPOT, CHANCE OF FLARES: The source of the incoming CME is AR1944, one of the largest sunspots of the current solar cycle. The active region sprawls across more than 200,000 km of solar terrain and contains dozens of dark cores. The largest could swallow Earth three times over. AR1944 is circled in this Jan. 9th snapshot from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory.

The sunspot is almost directly facing Earth. This makes it a threat for geoeffective eruptions. NOAA forecasters estimate an 80% chance of M-class flares and a 50% chance of X-flares on Jan. 9th.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geomagnetic; nuttery; solarflares; sun; sunspots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Clara Lou

That’s very interesting...I was just noticing that the amount of static electricity seem very high today. Every time a move another shock. I wonder if there is any connection?


61 posted on 01/09/2014 9:47:11 AM PST by mikemoose (Pray for the Unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; grania
Nope. Just more Northern Lights

And perhaps some radio interference.

62 posted on 01/09/2014 9:49:40 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

63 posted on 01/09/2014 9:56:30 AM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired
I know, and if you haven't seen this 6 minute 57 second video, you should.
64 posted on 01/09/2014 10:03:25 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired
Here is an interesting chart and commentary: Historical Correlation of the Dalton and Maunder Minima with Sunspot Activity The very cold temperatures from 1790 through 1830 are usually explained as being due to increased volcanic activity, including the Mount Tambora eruption of 1815 that caused the Year Without a Summer, 1816. However, low solar activity, with peak Sunspot counts of only 45 for Sunspot Cycles #5 and #6, is most likely the major cause. Even lower Sunspot counts (below 10) occurred during the earlier Maunder Minimum (1650 to 1700). These periods of Global Cooling were marked by crop failures that are inimicable to human life.
65 posted on 01/09/2014 10:05:31 AM PST by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
"Some people believe differently."

What the guy in that video says does not conflict with what I said which is that low solar activity doesn't cause anything directly (nor high activity).

He is showing the 300 mb jet on that video not the vortex at 10 mb. The Vortex is simply a low pressure in the stratosphere and he is correct at the end when he says "continuity with the upper stratospheric flow". The jet he shows does feedback to the vortex and the vortex can then coincide with a dip in the jet if it is broken by a vertical intrusion from that same jet. But they are not the same thing.

It is true that the SSW's are more likely at times of low solar activity (e.g. the largest ever was Jan 1997) they also take place with medium activity (e.g. Jan 84 mentioned above). Again, there is no direct cause and effect, just a tendency for low solar activity to result in uneven heating the stratosphere and thus a tendency (but by no means a certainty) of these types of events. They are simply terrestrial weather which overrides any effect the sun has or human CO2 for that matter.

66 posted on 01/09/2014 10:06:52 AM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Nothing to concern yourself with. Your daughter’s flight will be unaffected.


67 posted on 01/09/2014 10:08:00 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

It means nothing. Really.


68 posted on 01/09/2014 10:11:14 AM PST by CodeToad (When ignorance rules a person's decision they are resorting to superstition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
My computer will be turned off from 5:30 pm this afternoon until some time tomorrow.
Remember 1989 with Quebec's blackout?
69 posted on 01/09/2014 10:14:27 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mikemoose
That's probably just very low humidity (dry air due to the cold snap), and the wrong clothes.
70 posted on 01/09/2014 10:17:50 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Ah, good clarification. I’m kinda new to the whole sun watching thingy and how it impacts earth.


71 posted on 01/09/2014 10:19:58 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Then we have a difference of opinion on ‘routine’: according to the chart linked at post 15 above, this magnitude occurs several times per solar cycle (11-ish years). Even accepting your ‘over 12 years’ figure, that’s still roughly once per solar cycle. And even t that, it’s not a Babylon-desolation-like event.

S5 level? Then yeah, I’d be a lot more concerned. S3 is stout, but it’s not gonna invoke Revelations 18.


72 posted on 01/09/2014 10:37:17 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
You don't know just how patch-worked our electrical grid is, right now, do you?
73 posted on 01/09/2014 10:42:23 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

It means she is headed to a better place ;)


74 posted on 01/09/2014 11:12:05 AM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired
“Are we supposed to take some precautions? ..... have a glass of wine?

Wine a little. You'll feel better.

75 posted on 01/09/2014 11:24:50 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Gun horror is not a productive emotion, it's learned helplessness disguised as moral superiority.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Never said it wasn’t... but you started by invoking the apocalypse.


76 posted on 01/09/2014 2:12:51 PM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
WE'RE DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!!!

No book covers today.

77 posted on 01/09/2014 2:58:04 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

I’m all bummed. It’s overcast and snowing. One of the few chances to see the northern lights from my house, and we have too much cloud coverage. :-( Maybe I’ll catch a break by later this evening...


78 posted on 01/09/2014 3:03:21 PM PST by Hoffer Rand (If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. *Asterisk.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

79 posted on 01/09/2014 4:48:19 PM PST by Redcitizen (Never bring a tank to a Chuck Norris fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

January 9th is almost over....... are we doomed yet? Are we? ~~~~sob~~~~


80 posted on 01/09/2014 4:53:53 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson