Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Born to Conserve
I think you are missing the point, which is that not all of higher education is watered down by an increase in the percentage of the populace that is going to college, nor are the academic standards of these schools being watered down by grade inflation.

Also, I seriously doubt you can back your assertion with a link stating that these schools only took the top 1% in the '40s. Besides, the number of college students going to college in the early part of the '40s was a bit lower than usual, due to a small issue called WW2.

106 posted on 01/08/2014 10:03:46 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51

“I think you are missing the point...”

I hope I’m missing your point because it going nowhere.

And as to your assertion that schools like MIT never took the top 1%, duh. If only 5% were going to college, and MIT only took those in the upper 20% of college students, that would be 1%. During the war, I am sure that MIT got somewhere above the first percentile — you know, developing radar and all.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I’m beginning to think you are not 1%er, or 5%er, but perhaps 35%er?


117 posted on 01/08/2014 12:38:28 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson