Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left's Latest Mantra: Income Inequality
Townhall.com ^ | January 7, 2014 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 01/07/2014 3:34:22 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Kaslin

Marxist just make up phrases to trick the masses. When the Clintons, Obamas and Gore’s give up their money, then we’ll talk.

Pray America is Waking


21 posted on 01/07/2014 4:22:59 PM PST by bray ("The Republic of Texas 2022" is coming in Feb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I want an income equal to Obama’s.


22 posted on 01/07/2014 4:46:15 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Seems like the best way to combat this new Income Inequality narrative is to actually ask for specifics from the Income Inequality cheer leaders.


23 posted on 01/07/2014 4:48:13 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The first step to income equality should be the deportation of the illegals. While the left will use this issue the crony capitalists are waging class warfare on working class Americans and the GOP is complicit. Republicans could take this issue from the Dems and uphold conservatism at the same time.


24 posted on 01/07/2014 5:21:04 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Among varous stats that get posted on social networking sites to feed this frenzy is the one that cites a study which shows that 95% of the income gains from 2009 to 2012 went to the top 1%.

But this is a stat that is a distortion on three levels:

1) It selective chooses a period to get that result, while ignoring that for the two years leading up to 2009 the "rich" lost more than they gained in the years that followed. In other words, for the five-year period the top 1% had a net loss of income.

2) When measuring income inequality it does not include government transfer payments (benefits) provided to the lower income levels.

3) The stat is looking at gross income, not just earned income. So since the super-rich are more heavily invested in volatile assets than the rest of us, then when there are major economic swings, up or down, then either way, the rich will naturally (and justifiably) have the lion's share of those gains or losses.

Note the link below which documents what I've said:

http://nationalreview.com/article/363701/truth-about-1-percent-alan-reynolds#!
25 posted on 01/07/2014 5:35:57 PM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Income Inequality is caused by Productivity Inequality.
26 posted on 01/07/2014 5:47:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Kaslin.

Breakout: Lawmakers Enlist Powerful New Wage and Wealth Gap Warrior - The Pope
Yahoo! Finance | Matt Nesto
Posted on 1/7/2014 2:51:33 PM by justiceseeker93
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3109322/posts


27 posted on 01/07/2014 6:53:29 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hey Judy, why don’t you work for minimum wage? Then you’ll be on par with the folks who work at WalMart. Or better yet empty your bank account and ‘’spread it around’’ you dumb bitch.


28 posted on 01/07/2014 7:35:24 PM PST by jmacusa ("Chasing God out of the classroom didn't usher in The Age of Reason''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
On "Meet the Press," PBS anchorwoman Judy Woodruff sounded the alarm, not as a dispassionate reporter but as a progressive advocate. While acknowledging Obama's problems with Obamacare, she breathlessly insisted, "At the same time, the argument for doing something about the economy, the argument for addressing inequality, is such a compelling argument."
Let me help you out here, Libtard Woodruff:

1) Recession: Your neighbor loses his job.
2) Depression: You lose your job.
3) Recovery: zer0bama loses his job.

Don't make me say that again.
29 posted on 01/08/2014 4:20:40 AM PST by Peet (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Do the job I do, work the hours I work, spend those days away from home, in the conditions I spend them in, and we can begin to discuss income inequality.

Anything less, bugger off!

30 posted on 01/08/2014 6:05:04 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily
I want an income equal to Obama’s.

Meh. Chump change.

More like Warren Buffett's

31 posted on 01/08/2014 6:13:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Income Inequality is caused by Productivity Inequality

Yep, if you want more income, be more valuable. Otherwise, you're assuming that you deserve something of what someone else has just because you exist.

Income is a direct measure of the value you provide for the person paying you. This is what makes an income tax, especially a progressive income tax, so immoral - it punishes your productivity.

32 posted on 01/08/2014 6:17:08 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m not rich but I would like to live like the rich. I think a logical conclusion to the income inequality movement is that poorer folks should be able to live like the rich.

Therefore, I’m looking for a wealthy liberal celebrity who has a huge mansion that I would like to move into and share.

Right now, I call dibbs on Barbra Streisand’s luxurious beach home in Malibu. I bet she has more bedrooms than she personally can use and the food/drink is probably first rate.

I know she’ll be happy to have the chance to show that her lib beliefs are not just window dressing.


33 posted on 01/08/2014 7:05:53 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It’s the latest in a long string of mantras used for turning our formerly free nation into a communist state.

Income inequality is about the dumbest one yet.

However, since they have been infiltrating our schools for 60 years, most people hear it and go, “Uh, YEAH! Income inequality, man!” without realizing that it does NOT mean more for them, but rather more for the bloated unconstitutional government to use to destroy us all.


34 posted on 01/08/2014 8:45:40 AM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

35 posted on 01/16/2014 5:05:12 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


36 posted on 01/18/2014 8:53:21 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson