Posted on 01/02/2014 10:59:13 AM PST by steelhead_trout
[W]hile crony capitalism has certainly flourished under the Obama administration, the GOP hasnt exactly gone out of its way to combat the trend.
Many have argued that taking on crony capitalism, and perhaps adopting a more populist tone that emphasizes the needs of working-class Americans, should be an important aspect of the GOPs rebranded agenda. By advancing a message and a policy agenda that combat the stereotype of Republicans as beholden to Big Business, the party could go a long way toward regaining some lost trust with the American people.
But the partys actions havent matched this desire to change tone. Entrenched special interests still hold political sway. The status quo ... is hard to crack. Additionally ... Republican efforts to strike a more populist tone and reach out to target demographics of minorities, single women, and millennials run the risk of alienating the partys traditional base. Old habits have been difficult to break.
The Republican National Committees own post-2012 autopsy report suggested that the GOP embrace comprehensive immigration reform in an effort to appeal to Hispanic voters.
Senator Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) and others have argued that opposing this effort would cast Republicans in the role of standing up for working Americans, who are likely to be the most harmed by the massive influx of low-skilled immigrants contemplated in the Gang of Eight proposal. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would have a negative impact on wages over the next decade. Big Business is eager to get its hands on cheap immigrant labor, never mind the still-high unemployment rate among native workers.
Republicans need to start addressing the insecurities of the poor and middle-class, and convince them that conservatism holds the solutions, says a senior GOP aide.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
i think the GOP needs to turn up the rhetoric....what do the rats offer other than rhetoric??
That's not going to happen any time soon. I mean look at all of their party planks:
Firearms | When was the last time the Republican party fought to repeal the NFA or GCA? |
Abortion | When was the last time the Republican party fought to repeal overturn or repudiate Roe v. Wade? (It was an illegitimate ruling, asserting that the federal government is superior to the States in all cases — not in merely those cases where the US Constitution says.) |
Accountability | When was the last time the Republican party pushed for severe punishment of government agents behaving illegally? Waco? Ruby Ridge? Fast & Furious? Benghazi? Libya? NSA? IRS? BATFE? |
Fiscal Responsibility |
When was the last time the Republican party offered a budget that would cut whole agencies from the FedGov? When was the last time they seriously pushed to reign in the Federal Reserve? |
Constitutionality | When was the last time the Republican party really fought over something because of the contra-constitutionality? (Individual members like Ted Cruiz and ObamaCare/Amnesty don't count. Neither do issues where they roll over and take it, like ObamaCare or eligibility.) |
But those are precicely all things that appeal to the base, but not Joe and Jane Sixpack. All they care about is pocketbook issues, jobs, and the rich getting richer and everyone else barely treading water. Yelling about Benghazi and Fast and Furious won’t get them on board.
It can't.
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. - Matthew 6:24
So the GOP can just go on representing the Crony Corporatist and then the TEA Party can represent the rest of America.
If the GOP does not figure this out they will be outflanked by Elizabeth Warren types from the Democrat side.
If the GOP does not figure this out they will be outflanked by Elizabeth Warren types from the Democrat side.
Pretty much.
The Chamber of Commerce is becoming a tool of mega-corporations and Wall street. Not main street American Businesses. I don’t think any reconciliation is necessary. Amnesty is great for big business. They avoid ACA fees and can lower wages. It is terrible for the rest of the nation. When demand for labor is low why would you ever try to increase the supply?
I dunno — a lot of people are pissed off (or at least weary) due to the NSA-spying… if you could connect the two in their minds* then they'll be PO'ed.
* Fairly easy, the irresponsibility/unaccountability breeds corruption and lawlessness that both are a symptom of.
The Chamber of Commerce represents big businesses, that want government to provide them with special laws and regulations to increase their profits.
The Chamber of Commerce is an establishment organization, and has declared itself to be an enemy of Conservatives and the Tea Party.
The way the Pope's trickle down warning was received, there is little chance the GOP's controllers will fetter those exporting poor and middle class jobs.
Why would any politician fight against his primary source of wealth? That would be fighting for cutting his own financial throat.
Screw the GOP.
Tax Revolt!
Starve the snake!
Why should we trust them?
The fight starts at the grass roots.
The Tea Party is the American working/middle class.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Working people are being ripped off by the welfare state. We should ensure that wealth goes to those that create it, not those who whine the loudest — Makers vs Takers. We’re on the side of fairness, not the left.
“Working people are being ripped off by the welfare state. We should ensure that wealth goes to those that create it, not those who whine the loudest Makers vs Takers. Were on the side of fairness, not the left.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=htX2usfqMEs#t=53
She is the inventor of "You didn't build that".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.