Okay, I had to LOL when I read this part...
Bunk.
There is zero global warming.
It is all a huge scam.
The model I use now to measure my death doesn't take into consideration that I will be MORE dead then than now.
Whew. Just in time to rescue the “climate scientists” trapped in the ice in Antarctica during the summer heat wave. Blunder down under? Natural process of cleaning up the gene pool?
The hoax that won’t die. These folks will never give up as long as there is grant money to be gained. Science has been indelibly besmirched by this sorry tale.
Is it my imagination or can you actually spot the coordinated propaganda efforts these days?
Expect several more ‘climate change’ stories to follow
The we must ban oceans, rivers and lakes immediately...............
Lying sos, satanist, communist MF’ers all!
Another New Year, Another New Spin On Global Warming.....
Oh and out of the 73 computer models in use... NONE OF THEM CAN PREDICT THE CLIMATE TODAY WHEN THEY ARE PROGRAMMED WITH THE ACTUAL RECORDED CLIMATE HISTORY THAT WE KNOW IS TRUE... THEY ARE ALL LIES BASED UPON LIES TO REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH AND TO PASSIFY THOSE THAT WORSHIP MAN AND NATURE BUT DENY GOD!
The marijuana cloud they've been smoking?
Like when Al Gore said in 2008 that the icecap at the North Pole would be gone within 5 years?
That would be today. And instead it’s bigger than ever. Winters are harsher, and last longer.
The world has been pumping out CO2 at record levels for the last 15 years. If the assumption is that CO2 is the direct driver of a warmer climate, why haven’t world temperatures gone up at all in that time?
Clearly the assumption is wrong.
They simply re-jiggered their models to fit them with past data and future preferences.
Right now warming is somewhere less than 1C per century and dropping. Unless his "corrected" model shows how and when it is supposed to accelerate I wouldn't give it a second thought.
OTOH, there is a nifty tug of war between the old school "it will get really warm" alarmsts and the "will you look at all those storms!" alarmists. Both sides contradict each other. What is missing in the piece about this research is that there must be less convection an fewer storms both tropical and in the mid-latitudes in summer.
note 2 things:
1-no comments allowed
2-their disclaimer at the bottom:
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
I really thought (incorrectly) that those who got Fs in physics went into politics.
Now I know that some of them manage to get into “climate research”.
These guys just keep digging don’t they??? They are claiming essentially an 8 to 10 degree F increase in temperatures….BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA. What they really ought to be concerned with is the cooling that is provably on going….but I won’t hold my breath for that
Jesus of Nazareth said, "And pray ye that your flight be not in the winter." (Mark 13:18)
Think he might've known something the Al Gores of the world don't? :-)
Beautiful! Actual results have not agreed with modeled predictions, so the solution is to create predictions at greater variance with actual results.
When does SCIENCE take offense at data?
1. Set alarmist goals that are far off(chronologically)
2. Collect grant money
3. See #1
