I’m not a big fan of the show (a couple of episodes were fun, and that was enough) but this is ridiculous. The guy was being interviewed and gave honest answers...and it was not an “anti-gay rant,” as described in the press...and now they’re being subject to ostracism by the entire world?
Gays are a tiny percentage of any population. How have they gotten so much power?
It makes no difference how big your population is, it’s the share of your group amongst the means of cultural production that is important.
Ephesians 6:12
King James Version (KJV)
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Because they are being USED by the left.
Simply put, the goal of “gay activism” is to criminalize Christianity.
“Gays are a tiny percentage of any population. How have they gotten so much power?”
The Nazis in Germany were a small percentage of the population when they gained power, too.
The gays are a front for a ruling class that has largely abandoned judeo-Christian morality. The includes the corporations such as Lockheed Martin that has now broken with the Boy Scouts.
Literally-- some 400 of the Fortune 500 have aggressive pro-homosexual policies that go beyond donations. They're into lobbying proactively for LGBT legislation, installing pro-gay norms for their own corporate recruitment, retention, and promotion of employees, etc. etc.
A lot of FReepers reflexively defend capitalism as a great system for freedom, and yet the Godless Capitalists are working in concert to destroy our moral, pro-faith-and-family American culture and replace it with hedonism, humanism, --- oh heck, I may as well say Baal, Moloch and Mammon.
Big Obama supporters too, natch.
Why?
Why is Big Capitalism so averse to freedom? And so perverse?
And why does Godless Capitalism -- and its huge destructive impact on culture ---win such uncritical support from FReepers?
Good q about gay power.
Another q. From article:
Was he accusing all (or most) gays of engaging in bestiality or of sleeping with multiple women? It appears not, although I can easily see why his critics would think otherwise, and in that context, he was right to clarify his comments.
Why are people accusing him of saying gays engage in bestiality? I’ve read it multiple time, & can’t figure it out. Huh?