Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

“The judge is a Bush appointee, by the way, so count me skeptical that that would accomplish much.”

The “Bush Appointee” ruled the cross was constitutional. It is the Ninth circuit that reversed that ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case last year, but said it could reconsider once a lower court enters a final judgment.

Burns ordered the cross to be removed then stayed that order until all appeals have been exhausted.

Both sides consider this a victory. Cross supporters say this ruling moves them closer to getting the case reviewed once and for all by the Supreme Court.

“I’m somewhat upbeat about this. Believe me, we’ve had darker days,” said one of the opposing lawyers, Charles LiMandri, president and chief counsel of Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund.


124 posted on 12/13/2013 12:58:05 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: 1035rep

Yes, we should probably blame the system rather than that particular judge.


142 posted on 12/13/2013 5:38:46 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson