Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

75% is an interesting figure because that is the approximate rate of EBT card users whom I observe in the supermarket check-out line either buying food I can’t afford, driving away in cars I can’t afford or (most often) both.


22 posted on 12/12/2013 11:48:04 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

It’s a gut figure to be sure. I realize there are people who need relief due to infirmary or something out of their control.

Whatever this groups comprises, be it 5% or 25%, the rest need to be weened off the government spigot. Cut the amount by 5% each month. In twenty months these folks need to find a way to support themselves.


34 posted on 12/12/2013 11:55:40 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Zero = zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman

In truth, if they cut it by 2.5% per month, that would still mean that in two years 50% of the greater welfare costs would be gone. In four 100% of the greater welfare would be gone.

Even in one year, over 25% would be gone. Not bad at all...


35 posted on 12/12/2013 11:57:28 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Zero = zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson