Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

There used to be a check and balance to this power. Some states had real Senates where Senators represented geographical areas rather than gerrymandered population groups. This gave rural voters a measure of power to prevent cities from riding roughshod over them.

In the 70’s, as I recall, the Supreme Court ruled that such arrangements were “unconstitutional” even though they mirror the structure of the Federal government, and required states to change their constitutions to require representation by population, the so called, one man, one vote, rule.

That is a major reason that cities have such enormous power inside of States.

I recall telling a “liberal” colleague about this. He said, “Oh No!” You have it backwards! the counties would not let the cities enact needed legislation! They were holding them back!


43 posted on 12/09/2013 7:09:24 PM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
In the 70’s, as I recall, the Supreme Court ruled that such arrangements were “unconstitutional”...

Sixties. Look up Reynolds v. Sims and Baker v. Carr.

44 posted on 12/09/2013 7:11:30 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson