Posted on 11/20/2013 3:38:55 AM PST by markomalley
The Congressional Black Caucus is fed up with Republican filibusters of President Barack Obamas nominees, which several black lawmakers said they believe are motivated in part by race.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicated Tuesday that its time to take action after Republicans blocked another judicial nominee Monday, and hell have strong backing from black House Democrats who will meet Wednesday to plot a strategy for moving stalled African-American nominees through the Senate.
I dont know whats gonna be discussed, but I know what needs to be discussed, said CBC member G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C. Weve got to seriously address the abuse of the filibuster rule in the Senate.
CBC members are still reeling from the three-week-old stalled nomination of their colleague, Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency and are also raw from Mondays filibuster of an African-American judge, Robert L. Wilkins, to serve on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Though Republicans insist the filibusters are tied to legitimate concerns about the need for additional judges on the D.C. Circuit, or, in the case of Watt, on his qualifications for the job, CBC Chairwoman Marcia L. Fudge on Monday suggested that race and other factors were at play, citing the number of minorities and women who have been filibustered.
And other black lawmakers insisted Tuesday that race is a factor.
Its not the controlling point but its a factor, no question about it, Butterfield said. The fact is, no sitting member of Congress in 150 years has been denied an up-or-down vote on a confirmation. Race has got to be a factor here.
It goes without saying, added Rep. Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., another senior member of the CBC. He called Republicans the descendants of Confederates.
No one makes a big deal of it, but if youre a fly on the wall in any of their homes Ill tell you what: If you track the Confederate Army to the Dixiecrats, to the conversation of the Republicans, to the districts that were affected, you may be dealing with different labels, but if they were ever able to track down their ancestors, theres a Confederate general in every damn living room.
As for what House Democrats can do to force Senate Republicans hands, its not much.
Im not sure theres much pressure the CBC members can put on the Senate, said Assistant Minority Leader James E. Clyburn, D-S.C., also a member of the CBC.
Reid, according to aides, is considering moving ahead with the nuclear option to confirm nominations with a simple majority vote.
The potential for a rules change reminded Clyburn of how the vote threshold for filibusters has changed in the past.
Theres precedence for this, Clyburn said Tuesday. When I was a young man and we were dealing with the civil rights issues of the 50s and 60s, it was a two-thirds that were required, and the Senate saw that as an impediment to moving this country forward, and thats when it dropped down to 60. Now were at the point where maybe we need 52.
Butterfield agreed that regrettably the onus is in large part on Reid to force a rules change.
Leadership within the CBC stayed silent Tuesday in preparation for Wednesdays meeting.
Following the Wilkins filibuster, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., chairwoman of the CBCs Judicial Nominations Working Group, released a statement saying she would lead a strategy discussion at the CBC meeting on Wednesday on moving African American judicial nominees through the Senate.
One tactic could be an extrapolation of what CBC members are already doing: attack Republican obstruction of Obamas nominees particularly African-Americans. That could boost turnout from a critical Democratic voting bloc in 2014 and undercut the GOPs big tent rebranding efforts.
One of the severe impacts of [the filibusters], and in large part you see this in the Judiciary, is that the Obama administration has been working tirelessly to diversify the bench, and that means women and people of color on the bench, said Marge Baker, executive vice president of People for the American Way, a liberal advocacy group that tracks judicial nominations. I think regardless of the motivation, its having a disproportionate effect on minorities and people of color, and thats something to be upset about, and I do think its going to have an impact in 2014.
In the Senate, Republicans arent buying it.
No nominee has been filibustered because of their race. I totally reject that, said Senate Judiciary Committee member Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., whose own nomination for a judgeship was blocked in the 1980s. If thats the tack theyre taking, I would be afraid that it would damage race relations unnecessarily and improperly.
I dont think anybodys given that any thought, said Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., because thats clearly not something that has motivated any of us, from what I can tell, on any nominees.
They also see race as a factor in what they had for breakfast this morning and what the weather is like on their vacation.
Okay. I fixed their headline for them.
I see race as a factor in gerrymandering of congressional districts. Iz I wrong?
How are you able to read my mind? I can't even do that!!
You wrote exactly what I was going to post.
The CBC is racist by definition. Were it not racist it would not exist. All the members are professional negros.
That is they are negros for a living
They use it because we’ve allowed it to “work” in the past.
Simultaneous invention? Whittle and von Ohain invented the jet engine at about the same time, each unaware of the other’s work.
Simultaneous invention?
Probably because we both realized that, once again, the sun rose today.
RACISM! Plain & simple. Billions all over the planet must have had the same, simultaneous (corrected for Local Solar Time, of course) thought.
Just for the record, the leaders of the Confederacy were Democrats. They were also the leaders of the political movement for the protection and expansion of black slavery.
How many Bush nominees were filibustered or stalled in committee? And how many of these were approved by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) or Sen. Carole Mostly-Wrong (D-IL)? I’ll bet race was a factor in many of those. They may claim it was ideological but I’ll bet race was a factor there somewhere.
Actually, I have an ancestor who fought on the Union side in the civil war. So take that Charlie.
“Black Caucus” sees race in everything.
Maybe the GOP like it when the black caucus runs their mouths.
I dont think this is good for Mark Pryor. It might help Landrieu with black turnout. But I dont know if they will turnout for Obamacare that 10% of people want.
The only thing that might work for black turnout is the Zimmerman case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.