Posted on 11/13/2013 8:46:16 AM PST by traumer
So few people have enrolled in Obamacare that desperate Democrats have stooped to launching a war on women with demeaning and sexist ads.
The latest marketing campaign implies that young women would only be interested in Colorado's government-run health care exchange if they get coverage for birth control pills to have sex with strange men. The most offensive ad shows a 20-something woman named “Susie” holding a packet of birth control pills with an open-mouth, wide smile. She is wearing a flesh-colored, low-cut, sleeveless top, tight skinny jeans and open-toed black heels.
Susie is leaning against “Nate,” who is wearing an untucked shirt with the top four buttons undone to show his hairy chest. He has a smirk on his face and one hand in the pocket of his jeans.
“OMG, he’s hot!,” Susie is shown saying. “Let’s hope he’s as easy to get as this birth control. My health insurance covers the pill, which means all I have to worry about is getting him between the covers.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
This from the same people who told us voting for Odinga is like having sex for the first time.
This from the same people who told us Sandra Fluke should get free sex stuff.
This is pandering to his second-most-reliable voter base: women.
..Targeting LIV ...womyn who voted for the One.
Single women voted for this guy - they get what they deserve.
Well, it matches Obamadork voters, does it not?
Nothing like a matched filter to extract the signals (and voters) one wants.
I didn’t know any of these women when I was in college. And come to think of it, I didn’t really want to. Then again, with me they didn’t have to use 0bamacare for their birth control. I used the most effective birth control ever created. My personality.
“Thanks to Obama other people are paying out the nose to subsidize my consequence free recreational sex life. Isn’t this a great country?”
Perhaps the government should not be spending any money on advertizing?
It was certainly bright to schedule the effectivity date after the Nov 2012 elections.
Rush was right - activist, liberal women DO tend to be sluts, and the Dems show that they agree when they put out ads like this. We’ve all seen the incredibly crude and vulgar signs that lib women typically use at demonstrations.
Narrow that down a bit - single/divorced women.
Married women’s votes aren’t nearly as skewed as the single/divorced women who are looking for “man-free take care of me” promise.
Nate’s thinking, “And she thinks I’m going to call her in the morning. And she thinks my name is Nate too!”
Slutcare
The funny thing is, SHE is going to pay more for this “insurance” policy than she’d ever pay for birth control out of pocket.
Democrat fact checking at its finest.
“Nate” doesn’t look “hot” - he looks like an airhead in need of a shave, and “Susie” looks like a combination airhead and skank.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.