Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; CodeToad

However, that is not really the point. The point is those who claim “natural born citizen” is defined by “natural law.”

We are asking for the page number to see if they are correct in their interpretation of the passage.


267 posted on 10/29/2013 4:07:23 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
-- However, that is not really the point. The point is those who claim "natural born citizen" is defined by "natural law." We are asking for the page number to see if they are correct in their interpretation of the passage. --

I think I made exactly the point, what you seek does not exist. There is no code book of natural law. There may be treatises and similar that expound on natural law, but those writings are not binding law, anywhere.

That your opponent in argument can't produce what you demand is a slam dunk given.

268 posted on 10/29/2013 4:13:04 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson