Posted on 09/26/2013 1:54:08 AM PDT by servo1969
Capitalization matters. A lot of these people calling themselves “Republicans” couldn’t even give you a decent defintion of “republic” without Google. I think to qualify as a “republican” you ought to at least be able to do that.
The feeling is mutual.
Heck, getting out of their districts is half the reason some of these guys run. (I think that is why there are so many closeted gay Republicans from Red States.)
LOL good point!!!
I see the “any R is a good R” crowd is warming up.
Fine we won’t sit out. We just won’t vote republican. Happy now?
I’ve heard that for 20 years now. And look at the rewards. Never again. I will vote for a candidate and stopped supporting a party some time ago. Anyone who has a problem with that....well...can jump off the bridge paid for by taxpayers and supported by that party.
According to polls, the military is the most respected group in America. The military is respected because it embodies leadership and courage.
Maybe the republican party can somehow glean a lesson from that, but I have doubts.
Look closely at the candidates and consider ones that show true outsider credentials ala Palin or Cruz or even Rand Paul.
Since you couldn’t take the time to read #21, you leave me nothing to respond to.
How does the layman’s definition of insanity go, doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results?
They started voting for a third party in Canada in 1993 and it took 10-15 years for the old “Progressive Conservative” party to fade away with a new “Conservative Party of Canada” emerging and coming into power.
I seriously believe that over 90 percent of the Republicans we elect are fake and phony insiders who imitate conservatism.
In the Senate Lee, Paul and Cruz seem to be the only real outsiders.
And consider this, after Boehner cut the tax increase and debt increase deal with Obama at the beginning of the year, fewer than 16 House Republican members were willing to challenge his leadership.
Speaking of Tories and Patriots...we should all ask ourselves how much we actually support those who advocate our principles, and how much we actually support those who don’t. How much support does one give to the Tea Party, how much to the existing federal government?
Read the description of the loyalists here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
and see if you recognize anyone.
1964: In the words of Nelson Rockefeller's public relations head, Stuart Spencer, "We had to destroy Barry Goldwater as a member of the human race."
Mitt's father George of Michigan, Scranton of Pennsylvania, the whole lot of the RNC establishment all joined the liberals to attack the "purveyors of hate" and the "KKK".
They tried to destroy Reagan but failed. Now it appears that their spite drives the effort to discredit Reagan. They play for keeps. They are the anointed ones along with the DNC.
BTW many of those liberals fled the Democratic Party and became Republicans as the Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats took over the Democratic Party in the 1970s.
If another one does come, get ready for a 24/7/52 FReepathon.
Agree. Focus on the state level, down ticket, assembly. Begin the process of State Amendment Conventions which will take several years. And further examine your state’s Secretary of State (SOS) as they manage election/voter oversight/rules. Read — Voter ID. Meeting with your local assembly reps is a good idea. The answer is not in DC.
215 dead wood Republicans or more in the House since fewer than 16 were willing to challenge Boehner’s leadership after he made his debt ceiling increase-tax hike “imperfect deal” with Obama at the beginning of the year.
MY CONGRESSMAN SCOTT PERRY OF PENNSYLVANIA’S FOURTH DISTRICT IS PHONY CONSERVATIVE I WILL VOTE AGAINST EVERY TIME IN THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION.
Rand is apparently trying to run for president in 2016 and thinks the pathway is to endorse McConnell for re-election next year. NOT.
He has ruffled some feathers like McCain’s and Christie’s but his Sunday comments dissing Cruz’s effort by suggesting it may not succeed smells a bit.
Nope. 1st Amendment rights aren't based on whether someone votes or not. Sorry it's not all nice and neat for you, but you don't get to control what other people do.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.