[SoConPubbie]

His plan was to send them home and to the back of the line.

But, that doesn’t fit into your PDS does it?

Here are the links, from this year, where Rand Paul clearly lays out his own Amnesty plan for 2 million illegals per year, based on a "Certification" from a Pro-Amnesty congress that the border is "secure". No Fence, No E-Verify, No punishments for ID Fraud, and all the other misdemeanors and felonies committed by the Undocumented Democrats he wants to pardon.

Rand Paul’s “Undocumented Citizens” Path to Legality (and Citizenship) (March 20, 2013)

Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform (March 19, 2013 Article)

Rand Paul's presence-and-jobs amnesty -- WITHOUT E-Verify

Rand Paul Defends Immigration Reform: 'I've Got A News Flash' For Coulter And Limbaugh

No, America Does Not Have “De Facto Amnesty”

GOP's Rand Paul, Dems' Luis Gutierrez in step on immigration reform

Rand Paul: Pathway To Citizenship Is Needed, E-Verify Is Not

Rand Paul On Illegals: Trust But Verify

Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul?

Paul: Republican Party in Need of Facelift

[Dead Corpse]

I’m seeing the same thing written over and over again. Rand didn’t like the original “compromise bill” BECAUSE it granted Amnesty.

His “path to legality” includes following the rules for worker permits/naturalization including a requirement to GO BACK and apply from your parent Country.

I swear, some of you idiots would say it was just a publicity stunt and meant nothing if Rand went to the border with a convoy of brick loaded trucks and started building a f*cking wall himself.

[jpsb]

All of your links are mid March or earlier, Paul appeared to be going wobbly Feb-March as he was thinking his way thru the issue. I like Paul a lot and I was worried he might go soft. He didn’t, I was at the time posting that if Paul went soft on illegals I would stop defending him and stop supporting him. Cut him a little slack, he is back on the reservation, he learned his lesson visa vi Rubio, lol.