Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII
Obama doesn't have the constitutional authority to declare wars but he has the legal authority (allegedly) to start wars. get it?
21 posted on 08/30/2013 8:46:22 PM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RC one

Obama doesn’t have the constitutional authority to declare wars but he has the legal authority (allegedly) to start wars. get it?

You’re like a liberal Supreme Court justice — twisting the constitution’s language to your liking. Congress was given authority to declare war, because — as Madison wrote in the Federalist papers — the president shouldn’t be allowed to launch wars (start wars, in your lingo) on his own. That’s what kings do, and the American Revolution and the Constitution were to free us from monarchy.


27 posted on 08/30/2013 8:50:49 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

That interpretation would render the Constitution meaningless and make the president a dictator with the U.S. military as little more than his own private army.


50 posted on 08/30/2013 9:39:01 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson