Yes, I get it —Israel would like the US to attack Iran.
Okay, okay, okay.
We get it.
And release Pollard, who is such a great hero, yes, three bags full.
Yessiree.
This testing aspect wouldn’t surprise me—the same setup existed in the Spanish Civil War, with Franco’s Republicans backed by the west and the Nationalists backed by Germany and Italy.
If Israel raises the issue, it quite worthy of considering.
They don’t idly make claims.
I think it has a rationale to it. Wouldn’t really surprise me.
Iran has been sticking it’s head under the tent in a number of other nations. This is more of the same, only it raises the bar considerably.
“Officials said Assad was no longer in control over much of his country as well as key military units.”
Let me get this right Bibi.
Whatever else Assad is, and in spite of antics of Hezbollah, Assad has in fact NOT allowed the Golan to be a flashpoint between Syria and Israel, correct?
And what is it you, Bibi, expect when the Syrian MB - the dominant political aparatus at the core of the Syrian “opposition” - is at the seat of power in Syria??
Do I believe Bibi, when he says Iran is more in control of Assad’s military than is Assad? NO. The network of Syrian allegiances that go to make up Assad’s leadership, in every sphere, is more solid and more in charge than anyone or anything from Iran.
I think you, Bibi, are making a big mistake as to whom Israel’s biggest long term enemies in Syria might be, and I believe none of the WORST internal groups against Israel are now in charge but could be if Assad falls.
Here’s the question...who do you trust more to tell the truth, the Obama administration, or the Israeli administration?
You can only pick one, wouldn’t want it to be easy.
Well now, here is somehting that might make sense about why chem weapons being used in Syria.
“Testing” must be the PC term.