Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston

All you’ve tried to prove is that Hamilton’s idea was so hare-brained that it didn’t even merit a “formal” presentation. Thus, it was rightly rejected. That you would try to resurrect this rejected idea outside of the due process of Constitutional amendment is repugnant and anti-American.


200 posted on 08/21/2013 8:24:28 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: Plummz
All you’ve tried to prove is that Hamilton’s idea was so hare-brained that it didn’t even merit a “formal” presentation. Thus, it was rightly rejected. That you would try to resurrect this rejected idea outside of the due process of Constitutional amendment is repugnant and anti-American.

Oh, come on.

Pretty much everyone in America thinks that "natural born citizen" and "born a citizen" pretty much mean the same thing.

Every single instance that I know of - and there are hundreds throughout US history - in which such terms are used, they're used interchangeably.

That being the case, the burden of proof is on YOU to come up with some hard evidence that there is any difference whatsoever.

Which you have utterly and absolutely failed to do.

Why? Because there is no such evidence.

And now you protest too much. Again, why? Because YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR YOUR STUPID-@$$ POSITION. So all you can do is throw slurs and try to attack those who don't hold your stupid-@$$ position as "repugnant" and "anti-American."

It's pretty pitiful.

208 posted on 08/21/2013 9:24:44 PM PDT by Jeff Winston (Yeah, I think I could go with Cruz in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson