Since the MSM doesn’t and won’t print important facts surrounding the case, but will imply villainy, I’m just presenting the flip side of the coin.
I find it easy to imagine a respectable man out with two women, both of whom may be polite people, when they are abused by a drunk, reasonable odds of which outside a nightclub. It was noted in the story that the man who was beaten first pushed one of the women, who objected and followed him complaining, and then he pushed the other woman, before being punched by the man.
Importantly, when the policeman arrived the three were still enraged at the beaten man, most of whose injuries probably happened with the first punch.
The initial call of the police was that it had been a “fight”, which implies physical aggression from both parties. This charge was upgraded when the extent of his injuries was determined.
What clouds the issue is first of all race, which truly does not seem to be a factor in this yet. The race of the beaten man is unknown, nor can it be determined as of yet.
I agree too much is not known.
I wonder if this guy was super soft and an easy mark, it doesn’t really even make a lot of sense to me. Rarely if ever, does a black guy who is by himself look at me in a menacing way, nor would I, him. I always strive to look edgy and mean while minding my own business. I am not saying the guy couldn’t kick my ass, but I at least like to give an impression that you are better off finding someone else to screw with.
And my point is I can’t imagine two women starting in on me for something like this. Frankly I wouldn’t even engage them, I’d shrug my shoulders in an apologizing way, and keep right on walking. Perhaps he was stumbling around and drunk? Again not saying the guy deserved it, I am just wondering why so much detail is left out.
I see now.
The prosecution would have loved to have you on George Zimmerman's jury.