New Jersey, 1981?
I am sure I have lots of company in total ignorance about this suit, and its yearly "renewal."
Several observations. First of all it's obscure and unknown; that is no longer true.
Number 2 -- it prevents the GOP from challenging FRAUDULENT VOTING, BUT NO OTHER PARTY OR GROUP WITH STANDING.
That can be fixed.
Finally, it is a curiosity that "stings" are legal to identify and catch prostitutes, drug dealers, car thieves and sundry other groups of criminals, but not fraudulent voters!
What's up with that?
Unfortunately no “Other Party Or Group” has the resources or standing to investigate vote fraud.
For instance most judges would toss out a Libertarian investigation into vote fraud because they have no standing - they weren’t going to win anyway so they weren’t harmed.
This is assuming, of course, the Libertarians had the resources for such an investigation in the first place.