“North Carolina Registers Over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112”
Is that in human, or dog years?
Meanwhile a couple days ago Juan Williams on Special Report said there is absolutely no proof of Democrat fraud...
Nothing to see here. Like the NSA snooping- just a few typos on numbers.
Move along now.
The Democrat conclusion: Voter ID is intended to make it illegal for old people to vote.
Election fraud “doesn’t exist” because the Republican Party is not allowed investigate per a consent decree from lawsuit.
http://tomohalloran.com/2013/02/18/why-the-gop-wont-challenge-vote-fraud/
This made the rounds a while back. Voters who registered prior to 1960 didn’t have to provide a proof of age, only swear that they were of legal age, and when an actual birthdate became required, the computer system automatically put everyone who didn’t have a date as being born on January 1, 1900.
The biggest smarmy loudmouth on TV is Alan Colmes. He talks fast, shouts, monopolized the conversation, and NEVER documents the "facts" he spews non-stop. His favorite line...
"Name one case of charge, arrest and prosecution of voter fraud! It is not a problem!"
Perhaps a database of these stories exists somewhere, and I would love to hear about it.
Bill O'Reilly's crackerjack research team seems unable ever to have a compilation at hand...
maybe its just one old D voting 583 times?
But but but Hillary JUST told us voter fraud charges are baseless. Now HOW can this be? She won’t lie, right Uncle Democrat?