Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
“IQ is a metric of such dubiousness that almost no serious educational researcher uses it anymore,” the Guardian’s Ana Marie Cox wrote back in May.

I don't know anything about Ana Marie Cox, but the above statement is sophistry at the least. I've been working in this field for 16 years, and we have never stopped using IQ as a means of measuring aptitude and estimating success, and there are no plans to do so in the future.

19 posted on 08/09/2013 3:29:05 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad

Re: “We have never stopped using IQ as a means of measuring aptitude and estimating success.”

British public schools and the civil service used IQ tests for decades, and perhaps still do.

Using that database, British psychologists created a huge body of literature on the correlation between high IQ and high income.

They also found a high correlation between high IQ and long life.

That is doubly interesting.

Because, virtually all British civil servants receive exactly the same health care from the NHS.


62 posted on 08/09/2013 4:39:31 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson